Back
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
Gum Bahadur Thapa – Appellant
Versus
Union of Inida – Respondent
JUDGMENT (Oral)
1. Vide the present petition, petitioners are seeking calling for records and quashing of the order dated 28.12.2022 issued by the Commandant of the 112 BN BSF; directions to the respondents (DG BSF, DIG SHQ RK PURAM & COMMANDANT 112 and 32 BN BSF) to give one notional increment to the petitioners for the purpose of calculation of pension and other terminal benefits as they have completed one full year of service on the date of retirement as per settled law in Annexure P6, Annexure P7 & Annexure P8; directions to the respondent DG BSF to grant the arrear to the petitioners with the rate of 12% as per law.
2. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that the issue(s) raised in the present petition have already been decided by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 2471/2023 in the case of The Director (Admin. And HR) KPTCL & Ors. vs. C.P. Mundinamani & Ors. as well as by this Court vide order dated 23.01.2020 in W.P.(C) 10509/2019 in the case of Gopal Singh vs. Union of India and Ors..
3. In view of above, we hereby direct the respondents to treat the present petition as representation filed on behalf of petitioners and take a final decision within eight wee
The court's decision was influenced by the application of settled law from previous judgments.
The central legal point established is the application of the Supreme Court judgment on annual increment and pensionary benefits to the petitioners' case.
The main legal point established is that retired personnel are entitled to one annual increment as directed by the Supreme Court in Director (Admn and HR) KPTCL.
The main legal point established is that the petitioners and all similarly situated persons are entitled to one annual increment in accordance with the findings of the Supreme Court in Director (Admn....
The court mandated the timely adjudication of a representation against a retirement order to uphold efficient administrative processes in service matters.
An employee is entitled to the annual increment earned on the last date of service, as established by the Supreme Court.
The court's decision was influenced by the settled issue in a related case by the Supreme Court, which supported the directions related to increment and pension revision for retired employees.
Petitioners entitled to notional increments post-superannuation based on prior conduct, as per binding judicial precedent.
The petitioner was given the opportunity to make a representation before the concerned respondents stating the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
