IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Suresh Kumar Kait, Neena Bansal Krishna, JJ.
Bijender Singh & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
The Director-general – Respondent
W.P.(C) 5377 of 2023 & CM Appl. 21033 of 2023
Decided On : 27-04-2023
Mandamus - Assured Career Progression Scheme - The court directed the respondent to take a final decision on the petitioners' representation within eight weeks from the date of the judgment.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners sought various reliefs related to the Assured Career Progression Scheme, and had already made a representation to the respondent, but no decision had been taken.
Finding of the Court:
The court disposed of the petition, directing the respondent to take a final decision on the petitioners' representation within eight weeks from the date of the judgment.
Issues: The main issue was the delay in the respondent's decision on the petitioners' representation.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for the respondent to take a final decision on the petitioners' representation within a specified timeframe.
Final Decision: The court directed the respondent to take a final decision on the petitioners' representation within eight weeks from the date of the judgment.
JUDGMENT (Oral)
1. Vide the present petition, the petitioners are seeking following reliefs:
"a.) Issue a Writ of mandamus or any other appropriate Writ/Direction/Order directing the Respondents to grant the Petitioner the benefit of the first Assured Career Progression ('ACP') Scheme with effect from October, 1999, when the Petitioner had actually completed 12 years of service instead of 30th December, 2000 or till the date of promotion as Head Constable;
b.) Issue a Writ of mandamus or any other appropriate Writ/Direction/Order directing the Respondents to grant the benefit of the 2nct MACP should be granted with effect from October, 2007 (instead of 1st September, 2008), when the Petitioner completed 20 years of service in the pay band of 9300-34800 with grade pay of 4200 from the date of completion of 20 years of service;
c.) To direct the respondent to fix the pay of petitioners/retired employees and admissible pay scale as per hierarchy after granting financial upgradation under MACP from their respective due dates in the pay scale of SI with admissible grade pay;
d.) To direct the respondent to issue revised pension order paying arrears of pension and the arrears of pay, accordingly on the interest @12%p.a. from the due date;
e.) provide relief to all retirees/employees/members of B.S.F. in accordance with the Judgement of this Hon'ble Court dated 01/05/2019 in the case Sunil Kumar Tyagi versus Union of India & Anr., W.P.(C) No. 3549/2018 and Subhas Chander & Ors. vs UOI, W.P.(C) NO. 929/2023 and without discrimination under the Scheme;
f.) direct the Respondents to implement the orders of this Hon'ble Court within time frame to be indicated to this Hon'ble Court keeping in view the old age of the retirees."
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that for the reliefs sought in the present petition, the petitioners have already made the Representation dated 10.01.2023, however, till date, no decision from the respondent has been taken.
3. Accordingly, we hereby dispose of the present petition directing the respondent to take a final decision on the Representation dated 10.01.2023 of the petitioners within eight weeks from today.
4. The decision, so taken, shall be communicated to the petitioners in writing within one week thereafter.
5. Accordingly, the present petition along with pending application is disposed of.
6. Needless to state that if the petitioners are still aggrieved by the decision of the respondent, they may challenge the same before the appropriate forum.
The court's decision was influenced by the interpretation of the ACP Scheme and the reliance on a previous Supreme Court decision.
The court emphasized the importance of timely consideration of representations and the option for petitioners to challenge decisions if still aggrieved.
The court emphasized the importance of the respondents taking a final decision on the petitioner's representation within a specified timeframe.
The court's decision highlighted the principle of timely decision-making by the respondent authority in matters related to the MACP scheme.
The court reaffirmed that under the Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme, eligible employees are entitled to benefits from the date notified by the government, with rates and payment of arrears....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.