SURESH KUMAR KAIT, NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
Kedar Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT (Oral)
CM APPL. 7700/2023
1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.
2. Application is disposed of.
W.P.(C) 2030/2023
3. Vide the present petition, petitioners pray as under:
a) To direct the respondents to grant benefit of arrears of 1st Financial Upgradation in the ACP Scheme from the date of completion of their 12 years of service till the date of promotion of Head Constable (GD);
b) To direct the respondents to grant the benefit of 2nd MACP Upgradation on completion of 20 years of service in the pay band of 9300-34800 with grade pay of 4200, from the date of completion of 20 years of service;
c) To direct the respondents to fix the pay of the petitioners in eligible and admissible pay scales as per hierarchy after granting financial upgradation under MACP from their respective due dates in the pay scale of SI with admissible grade pay;
d) To direct the respondents to issue revised pension order paying arrears of pension in cases of petitioner nos.16 and 23 and the arrears of pay, accordingly, on the interest @ 12% p.a. from the date due.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this issue has already been decided by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Union o
The court's decision was influenced by the interpretation of the ACP Scheme and the reliance on a previous Supreme Court decision.
The court emphasized the importance of the respondents taking a final decision on the petitioner's representation within a specified timeframe.
The court emphasized the importance of timely consideration of representations and the option for petitioners to challenge decisions if still aggrieved.
The court's decision was influenced by a previous decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court on the same issue.
The court mandates the Respondents to decide a pending representation concerning financial up-gradation and pay fixation within a stipulated timeframe, emphasizing procedural adherence.
The court's decision was influenced by specific Supreme Court and Division Bench judgments on financial upgradation benefits under the ACP scheme.
The court applied the principle of mandamus and relied on relevant judgments to direct the respondents to consider the petitioners' claim for financial upgradation.
Employees completing 24 years service before 31.08.2008 entitled to 2nd ACP in GP Rs.2400/- in promotional hierarchy post pay merger, ignoring prior identical upgradations, followed by 3rd MACP in GP....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.