Rajendra Singh Shekhawat vs Union of India

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Del) 1378

SURESH KUMAR KAIT, NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
Rajendra Singh Shekhawat – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Sanjay M Tripathi, Advocate, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Shagun Shahi Chugh, Advocate, for the Respondent.
Mr. Aditya Khurana, Advocate with Mr. Hemendra Singh, DC LAW, BSF, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT (Oral)

CM APPL.19073/2023 (exemption)

1. The application is allowed, with a direction to the applicant to file requisite legible copies of documents and annexures within four weeks.

2. The application is accordingly disposed of.

W.P.(C) 4936/2023

3. The petitioner in his petition has made following prayers:

a) To direct the respondents to grant the petitioner the benefit of arrears of 1st Financial Upgradation in the ACP Scheme from the date of completion of their 12 years of service till the date of promotion as Head Constable.

b) To direct the respondents to grant the petitioners the benefit of 2nd MACP Upgradation on completion of 20 years of service in the pay band of 9300-34800 with grade pay of 4200, from the date of completion of 20 years of service.

c) To direct the respondents to fix the pay of petitioners in eligible and admissible pay scales as p er hierarchy after granting financial upgradation under MACP from their respective due dates in the pay scale of SI (Sub Inspector) with admissible grade pay.

d) To direct the respondents to issue revised pension order paying arrears of pension in cases of Petitioner Nos. 16 and 23 and the arrears of pay, accordingly on th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document