Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Suresh Kumar Kait, Neena Bansal Krishna, JJ.
Kamal Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India & Ors. – Respondents
W.P.(C) 5584 of 2023
Decided On : 01-05-2023
PIS Data - Petitioner's Posting - Court directs respondents to treat the petition as representation and decide within four weeks
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner seeks directions to remove an entry in his PIS data showing him in Home Zone instead of Out of Home Zone and to post him in Home State or at least in any unit in the Home Zone instead of his continuity in OHZ.
Finding of the Court:
The court directs the respondents to treat the petition as a representation and decide within four weeks, with the decision communicated to the petitioner within one week thereafter with a reasoned order.
Issues: Petitioner's posting and PIS data entry
Ratio Decidendi: The court has the authority to direct the respondents to treat the petition as a representation and decide on the petitioner's posting within a specified timeframe.
Final Decision: The court directs the respondents to treat the petition as a representation and decide within four weeks, with the decision communicated to the petitioner within one week thereafter with a reasoned order.
JUDGMENT (Oral)
1. Vide the present petition, petitioner is seeking directions to the respondents to remove impugned entry in his PIS data which shows him in Home Zone (HZ) instead of Out of Home Zone (OHZ) and to post him in Homs State or at least in any unit in the HZ instead of his continuity in OHZ.
2. After hearing learned counsel for parties in brief, we hereby dispose of present petition by directing the respondents to treat the present petition as representation on behalf of petitioner and decide the same within four weeks. The decision so taken shall be communicated to the petitioner within one week thereafter with a reasoned order.
3. Needless to say, if the petitioner feels aggrieved by the decision of the respondents on his representation, he may approach appropriate forum.
The court has the authority to direct the respondents to decide on the petitioner's posting within a specified timeframe.
The court has the authority to direct the respondents to decide the petitioner's representation and communicate the decision with a reasoned order.
The court emphasized the importance of the respondents deciding the petitioner's representation and communicating the decision with a reasoned order, in line with the petitioner's request for retenti....
Timely decision on representations and communication of reasoned orders by the respondents.
The court emphasized the importance of the respondent deciding the petitioner's representation and communicating the decision with a reasoned order.
The court emphasized the importance of timely decision-making and communication of reasoned orders by the respondents in response to the petitioner's representation.
In the interest of justice, the court directed the respondents to treat the petition as a representation and decide within a specified timeframe.
The court emphasized the obligation to consider the petitioner's representation for promotion and communicate the decision within a specified timeframe.
Administrative authorities must timely decide on service-related petitions made by their employees, ensuring adherence to procedural fairness.
The court emphasized the importance of timely decision-making on the petitioner's representation and the stay of any movement order until the representation is decided.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
