Back
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Sunder Singh (CT/GD Cisf) – Appellant
Versus
Director General – Respondent
JUDGMENT (Oral)
1. Vide this petition, petitioner is praying as under:
"(a) To set aside the Transfer Order No.E-38014/1/AS/ADM/IUT-23 (SI/EXE TO CT/GD)/-5548 DATED 17.05.2023 and Order No.E38014/AS_/ADM/17th IUT-2023(319)/2022/3280 dated 26.05.2023 issued by the respondents qua petitioner.
(b) To issue a writ/direction/order commanding the respondents for posting the petitioner to IGSTPP Jhajjar being a couple case."
2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that for the aforesaid relief(s), petitioner made a representation dated 18.05.2023 to the respondents, however, till date, the said representation has not been decided by the respondents.
3. In view of above, we hereby dispose of present petition by directing the respondents to decide the representation dated 18.05.2023 filed by petitioner within three weeks. The decision so taken shall be communicated to the petitioner within three days thereafter with a reasoned order.
4. Till the decision is taken on representation of petitioner, the petitioner shall not be relieved from present posting.
5. Pending applications also stand disposed of.
6. Needless to say, if the petitioner feels aggrieved by the decision of the responde
The court emphasized the importance of timely decision-making and communication of reasoned orders by the respondents in response to the petitioner's representation.
Administrative decisions may be challenged on grounds of arbitrariness, ensuring employee tenure rights are protected until a fair decision on representation is made.
The court emphasized the importance of the respondent deciding the petitioner's representation and communicating the decision with a reasoned order.
The court emphasized the need for expeditious redressal of grievances and directed the competent authority to decide the representation in accordance with the law.
The court emphasized the importance of the respondents deciding the petitioner's representation and communicating the decision with a reasoned order, in line with the petitioner's request for retenti....
The court established that representations regarding employment vacancies must be considered expeditiously by the competent authority, adhering to legal standards.
The legal principle established is that authorities must consider representations regarding vacancies in a timely manner, ensuring adherence to legal standards without bias in decision-making.
The legal principle established is that authorities must consider representations regarding vacancies in a timely manner, ensuring adherence to lawful procedures without bias.
The legal principle established is that authorities must consider representations regarding employment vacancies in a timely manner, ensuring adherence to legal processes without bias.
The court established that timely consideration of representations regarding employment vacancies is essential, and decisions must be made in accordance with the law without bias.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
