SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 1513

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Suresh Kumar Kait, Manoj Jain, JJ.
Millie Murmu (dr.) – Appellant
Versus
Shri Ved Prakash Badola – Respondent
CONT.CAS(C) 562 of 2023 & CM Appls. 22248-22249 of 2023
Decided On : 02-05-2023

Advocates appeared:
Dr. Swati Jindal Garg, Ms. Arushi Kulshrestha and Mr. Sowmya China, Advocates, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, CGSC with Ms. Niyati Sharma, GP and Mr. Hemendra Singh, DC (Law), BSF, for the Respondent.

Disobedience of court orders can lead to contempt proceedings, but withdrawal of the orders in question can lead to the disposal of the petition.

Headnote:

Contempt - Disobedience of Court Order - The court disposed of the petition seeking initiation of contempt proceedings against the contemnor for willfully disobeying the court order and directed the respondent to withdraw the orders in question.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought initiation of contempt proceedings against the contemnor for disobeying a court order and requested the withdrawal of specific orders.

Finding of the Court:

The court disposed of the petition and pending applications after the petitioner withdrew the petition regarding one order, and the respondent conceded to withdrawing the other order inadvertently.

Issues: Contempt of court, disobedience of court order, withdrawal of orders

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the petitioner's withdrawal of the petition regarding one order and the respondent's concession to withdrawing the other order inadvertently.

Final Decision: The court disposed of the petition and pending applications, directing the respondent to withdraw the orders in question.

JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. Vide the present petition, petitioner is seeking initiation of contempt proceeding against the contemnor for willfully and deliberately disobeying the order dated 31.05.2022 passed by this Court in the W. P. (C) 8285/2022; and directions to the respondent/Contemnor to withdraw the order dated 13.07.2022 and the order dated 14.01.2023.

2. Learned counsel for petitioner, on instructions, submits that she wishes to withdraw the present petition qua order dated 13.07.2022 and seeks permission to take appropriate steps available under the law.

3. As far as order dated 14.01.2023 is concerned, learned counsel for respondent, who is appearing on advance notice, has fairly conceded that the said order has been passed inadvertently qua the petitioner herein. Accordingly, on instructions, learned counsel for respondent withdraws the order dated 14.01.2023 qua the petitioner herein.

4. In view of above, the present petition and pending applications stand disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top