JUDGMENT

Jyoti Singh, J. (Oral)--Present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:

"i) issue an appropriate writ, order or direction quashing and setting aside the impugned penalty orders dated 01.07.2015 and 15.07.2015 passed by the department, vide which petitioner was removed from the service of the respondent department; and

ii) issue an appropriate writ, order or direction quashing and setting aside the impugned order dated 01.09.2015 passed by the Appellate Authority, vide which petitioner's mercy petition was rejected; and

iii) issue an appropriate writ, order or direction quashing and setting aside the impugned charge sheet dated 22.07.2013, disciplinary proceedings along with enquiry report dated 23.12.2014; and

iv) issue an appropriate writ, order or direction to reinstate the petitioner as per his capacity with the respondent department; and

v) issue an appropriate writ, order or direction to grant all consequential benefits to the petitioner, after his reinstatement."

2. Learned counsel for Respondents No.2 to 4 takes a preliminary objection to the maintainability of the writ petition on the ground that this Court lacks the territorial jurisdiction to enter