Back
PRATHIBA M. SINGH
R. N. Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
2. The Petitioner - Mr. R.N. Singh was appointed as a judicial member of the Central Administrative Tribunal (hereinafter `CAT') vide appointment order dated 3rd July, 2018, which reads as under:
"1. The President is pleased to appoint Shri R.N. Singh, Advocate as Judicial Member in the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) in the scale of pay of Rs.2,25,000/- (fixed) for a period of 05 years from the date of assumption of the charge of the post, or till the age of 65 years, whichever is earlier.
2. The conditions of service of Shri R.N. Singh as Judicial Member in the Central Administrative Tribunal shall be governed by the provisions of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 and the rules made there under, as amended from time to time.
3. On the recommendation of Chairman, CAT initial place of posting of Shri R. N. Singh shall, be CAT, Mumbai Bench. Sh. R. N. Singh is required to join the CAT, Mumbai Bench within thirty days from the date of issue of this order failing which the above appointment shall be treated as cancelled.
4. This order issues in compliance with the order of the Appointment Com
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of the provisions of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 and the Tribunal Reforms Act, 2021, particularly regarding the conti....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of tenure stability and judicial independence in determining the commencement date of re-appointment, emphasizing that a judge shoul....
Courts will not entertain pleas for extension of tenures when members have accepted initial appointments and when such extension would interfere with ongoing selection processes.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of adjudicatory experience and the role of the Search-cum-Selection Committee in making recommendations for the appointment of the C....
Employment and Service matter – Pension - While considering Tribunal Rules of 2020, which were notified held Chairpersons, Vice-Chairpersons and Members of Tribunals appointed prior, shall be governe....
Pension benefits for Members (Judicial) of the Railway Claims Tribunal are governed strictly by applicable statutory rules, and prior legal practice cannot be included as qualifying service.
when a recommendation is made by the Selection Committee comprising of such high ranking officials and even constitutional functionary, there has to be a very strong and justifiable reason to decline....
Technical Members can function as Chairperson of Intellectual Property Appellate Board.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
