SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 4599

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Vibhu Bakhru, Amit Mahajan, JJ.
Bishan Das Goyal Huf – Appellant
Versus
The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-14 – Respondent
W.P.(C) 2693 of 2019
Decided On : 18-05-2023

Advocates appeared:
Ms. Suruchi Aggarwal, Mr. Vineet Garg & Mr. Abhishek Garg, Advocates, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Shailendera Singh, Senior SC with Ms. Dacchita Shahi, Mr. Viplav Acharya & Mr. Akash Saxena,Advocates, for the Respondent.

The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of the definition of 'case' under Clause (b) of Section 245A of the Income Tax Act, which determines the maintainability of settlement applications based on pending assessment proceedings.

Headnote:

Settlement Application - Income Tax Act - The court upheld the decision of the Income Tax Settlement Commission to reject the petitioner's application under Section 245C(1) of the Act for the Assessment Years 2012-13, 2013-14 and 2014-15, as there were no pending assessment proceedings for the petitioner for those years.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner challenged the order of the Income Tax Settlement Commission rejecting the settlement application for the Assessment Years 2012-13, 2013-14 and 2014-15, as there were no pending assessment proceedings for the petitioner for those years.

Finding of the Court:

The court upheld the decision of the Commission, stating that the proceedings for assessment or reassessment under Section 147 of the Act had not commenced for the mentioned assessment years, and therefore, the petitioner's application under Section 245C of the Act was not maintainable.

Issues: Validity of the rejection of the settlement application under Section 245C(1) of the Income Tax Act for the Assessment Years 2012-13, 2013-14 and 2014-15.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the interpretation of Clause (b) of Section 245A of the Act, which defines 'case' as any pending assessment proceedings before an Assessing Officer. It concluded that as no proceedings for assessment or reassessment had commenced for the mentioned assessment years, the rejection of the petitioner's application was valid.

Final Decision: The petition was dismissed, and the decision of the Income Tax Settlement Commission to reject the petitioner's application under Section 245C(1) of the Act for the Assessment Years 2012-13, 2013-14 and 2014-15 was upheld.

JUDGMENT

Vibhu Bakhru, J.

1. The petitioner has filed the present petition impugning an order dated 19.12.2017 passed by the Income Tax Settlement Commission (hereafter `the Commission') under Section 245D(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereafter `the Act') to the limited extent that the settlement application under Section 245C(1) of the Act was held to be invalid for the Assessment Years 2012-13, 2013-14 and 2014-15.

2. The Commission had concluded that there were no proceedings for assessment, relating to the petitioner, pending under the Act in respect of the said assessment years and thus, there was no case relating to the petitioner in respect of the said assessment years. Therefore, the application under Section 245C(1) of the Act would not be maintainable in respect of the said assessment years.

3. Thus, the question that falls for consideration of this Court is whether the Commission had erred in rejecting the petitioner's application under Section 245C(1) of the Act in respect of the Assessment Years 2012-13, 2013-14 and 2014-15. Admittedly, the time for the Assessing Officer to make an assessment pursuant to the returns filed by the petitioner under Section 139 of the Act in respect of the Assessment Years 2012-13, 2013-14 & 2014-15 had expired and no notice was issued under Section 148 of the Act for assessment, reassessment or re-computation of the petitioner's income for the said years.

4. The controversy involved in the present case is covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Sushil Kumar Goyal & Ors. v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-1 & Ors., WP(C) No. 3928/2017.

5. Clause (b) of Section 245A of the Act, as applicable at the time of making the application, reads as under:

"245A. In this Chapter, unless the context otherwise requires,-

(a) xxx xxx xxx

(b) "case" means any proceeding for assessment under this Act, of any person in respect of any assessment year or assessment years which may be pending before an Assessing Officer on the date on which an application under sub-section (1) of section 245C is made.

Explanation.-For the purposes of this clause-

(i) a proceeding for assessment or reassessment or recomputation under section 147 shall be deemed to have commenced-

(a) from the date on which a notice under section 148 is issued for any assessment year;

(b) from the date of issuance of the notice referred to in sub- clause (a), for any other assessment year or assessment years for which a notice under section 148 has not been issued, but such notice could have been issued on such date, if the return of income for the other assessment year or assessment years has been furnished under section 139 or in response to a notice under section 142;

(ii) ***

(iii) a proceeding for making fresh assessment in pursuance of an order under section 254 or section 263 or section 264, setting aside or cancelling an assessment shall be deemed to have commenced from the date on which such order, setting aside or cancelling an assessment was passed;

(iiia) a proceeding for assessment or reassessment for any of the assessment years,referred to in clause (b) of sub-section (1) of section 153A in case of a person referred to in section 153A or section 153C, shall be deemed to have commenced on the date of issue of notice initiating such proceeding and concluded on the date onwhich the assessment is made;

(iv) a proceeding for assessment for any assessment year, other than the proceedings of assessment or reassessment referred to in clause (i) or clause (iii) or clause (iiia)", shall be deemed to have commenced from the date on which the return of income for that assessment year is furnished under section 139 or in response to a notice served under section 142 and concluded on the date on which the assessment is made; or on the expiry of two years from the end of relevant assessment year, in case where no assessment is made;"

6. A plain reading of Explanation (i) to Clause (b) of Section 245A of the Act clearly indic

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top