SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 4582

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Suresh Kumar Kait, Neena Bansal Krishna, JJ.
Kishan Lal & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
Union of India & Anr. – Respondents
W.P.(C) 6838 of 2023
Decided On : 19-05-2023

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Abhay Kumar Bhargava & Mr. Satyarth S. Sinha, Advocates, for the Petitioners.
Mr. Jashwinder Singh, Senior Panle Counsel & Mr. Sahib Gurdeep Singh, Govt. Pleader for Union of India with Mr. Hemendra Singh, DC (Law) BSF.

The court's emphasis on the need for the respondents to consider the petition as a representation and provide a reasoned decision within a specified timeframe.

Headnote:

Mandamus - Benefits of Higher Pay and MACP Scheme - The court directed the respondents to treat the petition as a representation and decide on the reliefs sought within four months with a reasoned order.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners sought writs of Mandamus to direct the respondent DG BSF to grant them the benefits of higher pay and MACP scheme, as well as arrears and related benefits.

Finding of the Court:

The court disposed of the petition, directing the respondents to treat it as a representation and decide on the reliefs sought within four months with a reasoned order.

Issues: Petitioners seeking benefits of higher pay, MACP scheme, and related benefits from the respondent DG BSF.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for the respondents to consider the petition as a representation and provide a reasoned decision within a specified timeframe.

Final Decision: The present petition was disposed of, with the direction for the respondents to treat it as a representation and decide on the reliefs sought within four months with a reasoned order.

JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. Vide the present petition, the petitioners are seeking following reliefs:

    "a.) Issue a writ of Mandamus or any other writ order or direction thereby directing the respondent DG BSF, to grant the benefits of the higher pay to the petitioner from the date they qualified the conversion test, or alternatively;

    b.) Issue a writ of Mandamus or any other writ order or direction thereby directing the respondent DG BSF, to grant the benefits MACP scheme to the petitioners, reckoning from the date they reported to Trade Course;

    c.) Issue a writ of Mandamus or any other writ order or direction thereby directing the respondent DG BSF to grant the arrears and other related benefits to the petitioners with the interest of 12% as per the settled law"

2. Mr. Jashwinder Singh, Senior Panel Counsel for the respondents, submits that the petitioners have not made any representation before the respondents for the aforesaid reliefs.

3. Accordingly, we hereby dispose of the present petition directing the respondents to treat the present petition as a representation of the petitioners and decide the same within four months from today with a reasoned order.

4. The decision, so taken, shall be communicated to the petitioners within one week thereafter.

5. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of.

6. Needless to state that if the petitioners are still aggrieved by the decision of the respondents, they may challenge the same before the appropriate forum.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top