SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 1608

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Suresh Kumar Kait, Neena Bansal Krishna, JJ.
Ashok Kumar Sharma & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
Union of India & Ors. – Respondents
W.P.(C) 7879 of 2023
Decided On : 31-05-2023

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Abhay Kumar Bhargava, Advocate, for the Petitioners.
Mr. Rahul Sharma, CGSC with Mr. Hardik Bedi, GP, Mr. Ayush Bhatt, Advocate and Mr. Hemendra Singh, DC (Law), BSF, for the Respondents.

The main legal point established is the court's power to issue a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents to treat the petition as a representation and decide within a specified timeframe.

Headnote:

Mandamus - Benefits for BSF petitioners - The court directed the respondents to treat the petition as a representation and decide within eight weeks, with a speaking and rationale order.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners sought benefits of higher pay, MACP scheme, and arrears from the respondent DG BSF.

Finding of the Court:

The court disposed of the petition by directing the respondents to treat it as a representation and decide within eight weeks, with a speaking and rationale order. Pending applications were also disposed of.

Issues: The issues revolved around the petitioners' entitlement to higher pay, MACP scheme benefits, and arrears from the respondent DG BSF.

Ratio Decidendi: The court directed the respondents to treat the petition as a representation and decide within eight weeks, with a speaking and rationale order.

Final Decision: The court directed the respondents to treat the petition as a representation and decide within eight weeks, with a speaking and rationale order. Pending applications were also disposed of.

JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. Vide this application, petitioners are praying as under:

    "(i) Issue a writ of Mandamus or any other writ order or direction thereby directing the respondent DG BSF, to grant the benefits of the higher pay to the 48 petitioners from the date they qualified the conversion test, or alternatively,

    (ii) Issue a writ of Mandamus or any other writ order or direction thereby directing the respondent DG BSF, to grant the benefits MACP scheme to the petitioners, reckoning from the date they reported to Trade Course.

    (iii) Issue a writ of Mandamus or any other writ order or direction thereby directing the respondent DG BSF to grant the arrears and other related benefits to the petitioners with the interest of 12% as per the settled law."

2. In view of issue(s) raised in this petition, we hereby dispose of present petition by directing the respondents to treat the present petition as representation on behalf of petitioners and decide the same within eight weeks. The decision so taken shall be communicated to the petitioners within one week thereafter with a speaking and rationale order.

3. Pending applications also stand disposed of.

4. Needless to say, if the petitioners feel aggrieved by the decision of the respondents on their representation, they may approach the appropriate forum.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top