SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 5058

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Suresh Kumar Kait, Neena Bansal Krishna, JJ.
Nikhil Mandal – Appellant
Versus
Union of India & Ors. – Respondents
W.P.(C) 7395 of 2023, CM APPL. 28770 of 2023
Decided On : 26-05-2023

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Harsh Yadav and Mr. Shashank Shri Tripathi, Advocates, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj CGSC with Mr. Kushagra Kumar G.P and Major Partho Katyayan, for the Respondents.

Timely decision on pre-confirmation petition and liberty to seek suspension of sentence if punishment is confirmed

Headnote:

Writ Petition - Confirmation of Sentence - The court directed the respondents to decide the pre-confirmation petition of the petitioner within two weeks and granted liberty to move an application for suspension of sentence if the petitioner's sentence is confirmed.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner was held guilty and sentenced to undergo one year six months Rigorous Imprisonment in Court Martial proceedings, but the punishment had not been confirmed by the Confirming Authority.

Finding of the Court:

The court directed the respondents to decide the pre-confirmation petition of the petitioner within two weeks and granted liberty to move an application for suspension of sentence if the petitioner's sentence is confirmed.

Issues: Confirmation of sentence, pre-confirmation petition, liberty to move application for suspension of sentence

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for timely decision on the pre-confirmation petition and granted the petitioner liberty to seek suspension of sentence if the punishment is confirmed.

Final Decision: The court directed the respondents to decide the pre-confirmation petition of the petitioner within two weeks and granted liberty to move an application for suspension of sentence if the petitioner's sentence is confirmed.

JUDGMENT (oral)

W.P.(C) 7395/2023

1. The present Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking the following reliefs :

    "(i) Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction, order or declaration, directing the Respondents herein to either confirm the finding and sentence dated 19.10.2022 (Annexure No. 4) or reject it, however in any case, take a call on the same and thereby affording the Petitioner right to take further appropriate legal remedy in law.

    (ii) Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction, order or declaration, suspending the finding and sentence dated 19.10.2022 (Annexure No. 4) and release the Petitioner on bail until the concerned authority takes a call on validity of the same; and/ or,

    (iii) Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction, order or declaration, directing that the Petitioner be released on bail until the finding and sentence dated 19.10.2022 is being confirmed by the concerned authority and due time is provided to the Petitioner to appeal the same; and/ or,

    (iv) Pass such other and further order(s) or direction(s) as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.

2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that vide the Court Martial proceedings dated 19.10.2022 the petitioner has been held guilty and sentenced to undergo one year six months Rigorous Imprisonment. However, till date the said punishment has not been confirmed by the Confirming Authority.

3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents along with Major Partho Katyayan submits that the petitioner made pre-confirmation petition dated 05.04.2023 and the same is pending disposal and has assured this Court that the said pre-confirmation petition will be decided within four weeks.

4. Since the sentence is one year and six months Rigorous Imprisonment and the petitioner has already undergone ten months sentence, we hereby direct the respondents to decide the pre-confirmation petition dated 05.04.2023 of the petitioner within two weeks from today.

5. After deciding the pre-confirmation petition by the Confirming Authority if the sentence of the petitioner is confirmed, then liberty is granted to the petitioner to move an application for suspension of sentence before the concerned Armed Forced Tribunal (AFT).

6. It is made clear that if AFT is not in motion, then the liberty is granted to move the application before the concerned High Court.

7. The petition and the pending applications are disposed of accordingly.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top