IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Suresh Kumar Kait, Neena Bansal Krishna, JJ.
Nikhil Mandal – Appellant
Versus
Union of India & Ors. – Respondents
W.P.(C) 7395 of 2023, CM APPL. 28770 of 2023
Decided On : 26-05-2023
Writ Petition - Confirmation of Sentence - The court directed the respondents to decide the pre-confirmation petition of the petitioner within two weeks and granted liberty to move an application for suspension of sentence if the petitioner's sentence is confirmed.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner was held guilty and sentenced to undergo one year six months Rigorous Imprisonment in Court Martial proceedings, but the punishment had not been confirmed by the Confirming Authority.
Finding of the Court:
The court directed the respondents to decide the pre-confirmation petition of the petitioner within two weeks and granted liberty to move an application for suspension of sentence if the petitioner's sentence is confirmed.
Issues: Confirmation of sentence, pre-confirmation petition, liberty to move application for suspension of sentence
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for timely decision on the pre-confirmation petition and granted the petitioner liberty to seek suspension of sentence if the punishment is confirmed.
Final Decision: The court directed the respondents to decide the pre-confirmation petition of the petitioner within two weeks and granted liberty to move an application for suspension of sentence if the petitioner's sentence is confirmed.
JUDGMENT (oral)
W.P.(C) 7395/2023
1. The present Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking the following reliefs :
"(i) Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction, order or declaration, directing the Respondents herein to either confirm the finding and sentence dated 19.10.2022 (Annexure No. 4) or reject it, however in any case, take a call on the same and thereby affording the Petitioner right to take further appropriate legal remedy in law.
(ii) Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction, order or declaration, suspending the finding and sentence dated 19.10.2022 (Annexure No. 4) and release the Petitioner on bail until the concerned authority takes a call on validity of the same; and/ or,
(iii) Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction, order or declaration, directing that the Petitioner be released on bail until the finding and sentence dated 19.10.2022 is being confirmed by the concerned authority and due time is provided to the Petitioner to appeal the same; and/ or,
(iv) Pass such other and further order(s) or direction(s) as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.
2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that vide the Court Martial proceedings dated 19.10.2022 the petitioner has been held guilty and sentenced to undergo one year six months Rigorous Imprisonment. However, till date the said punishment has not been confirmed by the Confirming Authority.
3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents along with Major Partho Katyayan submits that the petitioner made pre-confirmation petition dated 05.04.2023 and the same is pending disposal and has assured this Court that the said pre-confirmation petition will be decided within four weeks.
4. Since the sentence is one year and six months Rigorous Imprisonment and the petitioner has already undergone ten months sentence, we hereby direct the respondents to decide the pre-confirmation petition dated 05.04.2023 of the petitioner within two weeks from today.
5. After deciding the pre-confirmation petition by the Confirming Authority if the sentence of the petitioner is confirmed, then liberty is granted to the petitioner to move an application for suspension of sentence before the concerned Armed Forced Tribunal (AFT).
6. It is made clear that if AFT is not in motion, then the liberty is granted to move the application before the concerned High Court.
7. The petition and the pending applications are disposed of accordingly.
Timely decision on pre-confirmation petition and liberty to seek suspension of sentence if punishment is confirmed
The court has the authority to direct the respondent to decide on petitions for suspension of sentence within specified timelines, especially when rigorous imprisonment is involved.
The court directed timely adjudication of a statutory petition under the Border Security Force Act, ensuring procedural compliance without addressing the merits.
The court has the authority to direct the Competent Authority to expedite the disposal of petitions and consider requests for suspension of sentence in accordance with the law.
The court emphasized the importance of timely adjudication of statutory petitions and the provision of relevant documents to ensure procedural fairness in administrative processes.
Prompt decision on application for suspension of sentence and provision of trial proceedings to the petitioner.
The court may suspend a substantive sentence pending appeal if the accused was on bail during trial, subject to conditions.
The court may suspend a substantive sentence if there are no immediate prospects for hearing a revision, subject to specific bail conditions.
The court may suspend a substantive sentence if there is no imminent hearing date for the revision, subject to specific bail conditions.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.