SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 4137

DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
Nitesh Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State GNCT Delhi – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Vinod Sharma, Advocate, for the Petitioners.
Mr. Hemant Mehla, APP, for the State.

JUDGMENT

Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)

CRL.M.A. 20245/2022 (exemption)

Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions.

CRL.M.C. 5064/2022

1. The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr. PC seeking quashing of FIR No. 179/2016 registered at PS Jyoti Nagar under Section 498A/406/34 IPC and section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 on the statement of Ms. Maushmi Chauhan.

2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that Respondent no.2/complainant married petitioner no.1 on 16.01.2014 in accordance with the Hindu Vedic Rites and Ceremonies at Arya Samaj Mandir. A female child `Niharika' was also born out of the wedlock on 22.11.2014. However, on account of temperamental differences and mental incompatibility, the parties started living separately and instituted multiple litigations against each other and their respective families including the present FIR. He submits that the chargesheet, in this case, has already been filed and the matter is pending before the Learned MM, Karkardooma Courts, New Delhi.

3. Learned Counsel further submits that during the pendency of the proceedings, the parties have resolved their disputes amicably with efforts of elders and relatives

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top