IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.
Firoz Khan & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
State of NCT of Delhi & Anr. – Respondents
Cr.M.C. 4455 of 2023
Decided On : 04-07-2023
Exemption - Quashing of FIR - The court allowed the exemption subject to all just exceptions and quashed the FIR based on an amicable settlement reached by the parties.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought quashing of FIR registered under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, citing temperamental differences and mental incompatibility with the respondent. The parties had reached a settlement resolving all disputes and agreed to live together peacefully.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the parties had voluntarily entered into an amicable settlement without fear, force, or coercion, and decided to give quietus to the proceedings. Considering the matrimonial dispute had been settled amicably, the court quashed the FIR and all related proceedings.
Issues: The issues involved the quashing of the FIR and related proceedings based on the amicable settlement reached by the parties.
Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the voluntary nature of the settlement, absence of fear, force, or coercion, and the desire of the parties to live peacefully as the basis for quashing the FIR and related proceedings.
Final Decision: The court quashed FIR No. 109/2019 registered under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, along with all related proceedings, based on the amicable settlement reached by the parties.
JUDGMENT
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)
CRL.M.A. 17072/2023 (Exemption)
Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions.
CRL.M.C. 4455/2023
1. The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr. PC seeking quashing of FIR No. 109/2019 registered at PS Welcome under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961.
2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that Respondent no.2/complainant married petitioner no.1 on 17.04.2011 in accordance with the Muslim customs and Ceremonies. However, on account of temperamental differences and mental incompatibility, the parties started living separately and instituted multiple litigations against each other and their respective families including the present FIR. There are three children both out of the wedlock. Both the parties state that they are residing together since for the last three years.
3. Parties have reached on settlement dated 10.04.2023 with following terms and conditions:
I. The settlement between the Parties envisages resolution of all disputes/differences. The Parties agree that with the due implementation of their respective obligations under the present Settlement Agreement, there shall not remain any claim of either Party outstanding on the other, either individually or collectively.
II. In lieu of their settlement, the present Settlement Agreement shall be implemented in the following manner-
A. On the basis of the present Settlement Agreement, the Parties shall prepare and execute necessary documents including affidavits, vakalatnama, undertakings, no objection certificate, Power of Attorney etc. for quashing of the aforesaid Case/Proceeding.
B. The said Quashing Petition will be filed before the concerned Court in relation to the afore-mentioned pending case/proceeding along with a copy of the present Settlement Agreement, supporting affidavits and such other papers/documents as may be necessary.
C. The Parties or through their representatives shall appear before the concerned Court on all dates of hearing when the afore-mentioned Quashing Petition seeking quashing of the aforesaid case is listed and give requisite undertakings/affidavits/statements etc. to the concerned Court in relation thereto till the said Petition(s) are finally decided/adjudicated by the concerned Court.
4. I consider that there would be no purpose of continuing with the trial as the parties have entered into the settlement voluntarily without any fear, force and coercion, and have decided to give quietus to the proceedings. It was a matrimonial dispute which has been amicably settled and thus the parties must be given a chance to live together peacefully.
5. Both parties are present in court and have duly been identified by the IO. Respondent no. 2 submits that she has entered the settlement voluntarily without any fear, force or coercion. She submits that other petitions have already been withdrawn or dismissed. And since the the parties are living together again, she has no objection if FIR no.109/2019 registered at PS Welcome under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961and all the proceedings emanating therefrom.
6. Taking into account the totality of facts and circumstances of the case, this court considers that the parties have entered into an amicable settlement out of their own free will, without any fear, force or coercion and they should be given an opportunity to lead their lives peacefully. No purpose will be served in continuing with the trial.
7. In view of the above, FIR no. 109/2019 registered at PS Welcome under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 and all the other proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.
8. The present petition along with all the pending applications stands disposed of.
The voluntary nature of the settlement, absence of fear, force, or coercion, and the desire of the parties to live peacefully were central to the court's decision to quash the FIR and related proceed....
The court emphasized the importance of amicable settlements in matrimonial disputes and the exercise of inherent powers under section 482 of the Code to secure the ends of justice.
The court can quash criminal proceedings based on an amicable settlement between the parties, as per the inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. and established legal principles.
The court can exercise inherent powers to quash proceedings based on an amicable settlement between the parties in matrimonial disputes.
The court can quash non-compoundable offences after considering the nature of the offence and the amicable settlement between the concerned parties, especially in cases arising out of matrimonial dif....
The court can quash an FIR under Section 482 Cr.P.C if the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and no useful purpose would be served by keeping the case pending.
The duty of courts to encourage amicable settlements in matrimonial disputes and the need for proper drafting of settlement deeds.
The court emphasized the exercise of inherent powers under section 482 of the Code to quash non-compoundable offences after considering the nature of the offences and the amicable settlement between ....
Matrimonial disputes should be put to quietus if the parties have arrived upon a genuine settlement, as established in previous judgments.
Courts should encourage amicable settlements in matrimonial disputes and may quash related proceedings if the parties have voluntarily settled the matter.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.