IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.
Sh Sagar Arora & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
The State & Anr. – Respondents
W.P.(Cr) 1279 of 2023
Decided On : 08-05-2023
498A/406 IPC - Quashing of FIR - Settlement agreement - Section 13B(1) of HMA
Fact of the Case:
The petition was filed to quash FIR no. 572/2021 registered under Section 498A/406 IPC at PS Uttam Nagar. The parties had entered into a settlement agreement for divorce by mutual consent without any monetary consideration.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the parties had resolved their disputes amicably and entered into a settlement agreement. The court considered the settlement and the voluntary nature of the agreement, leading to the quashing of the FIR and all proceedings.
Issues: The main issue was the quashing of the FIR and related proceedings in light of the amicable settlement between the parties.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the inherent powers under section 482 of the Code to secure the ends of justice and prevent abuse of the process of any court. It also considered the settlement agreement and the voluntary nature of the agreement as grounds for quashing the FIR and proceedings.
Final Decision: FIR no. 572/2021 registered under Section 498A/406 IPC at PS Uttam Nagar and all the other proceedings emanating therefrom were quashed. The petition was disposed of.
JUDGMENT
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)
CRL.M.A. 12045/2023
Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions.
W.P.(CRL) 1279/2023
1. The present petition has been filed for quashing FIR no. 572/2021 registered under Section 498A/406 IPC at PS Uttam Nagar.
2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that Respondent no.2/complainant married petitioner no.1 on 07.07.2019 in accordance with the Hindu Rites and Ceremonies. A male child namely master Ujjwal Arora (DOB: 02.11.2020) was born out of the said wedlock who is at present in the custody of petitioner no. 1.However, on account of temperamental differences and mental incompatibility, the parties are residing separately since 18.12.2020 and instituted multiple litigations against each other and their respective families including the present FIR. Ld. Counsel further submits that the charge-sheet, in this case, has already been filed and the matter is pending before the Learned MM, Dwarka Courts, Delhi.
3. Learned Counsel further submits that during the pendency of the proceedings, the parties have resolved their disputes amicably, and in furtherance thereof, they have entered into a settlement agreement dated 02.04.2022 before the Mediation Centre, Dwarka Courts, Delhi. As per the settlement it has been agreed between the parties that the parties shall seek divorce by mutual consent without any monetary consideration.
4. Pursuant to the settlement, a mutual divorce petition was also filed and a decree of divorce was granted vide order dated12.12.2022 passed by Learned Principal Judge, Family Court (South-West), Dwarka Courts, New Delhi.
5. Furthermore, the Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that since the parties have resolved all their differences amicably, therefore, it would be in the interest of justice to quash FIR and all the proceedings emanating therefrom.
6. It is settled that the inherent powers under section 482 of the Code are required to be exercised to secure the ends of justice or to prevent abuse of the process of any court. Further, the High Court can quash non-compoundable offences after considering the nature of the offence and the amicable settlement between the concerned parties. Supreme Court and this Court have repeatedly held that the cases arising out of matrimonial differences should be put to a quietus if the parties have reached an amicable settlement. Reliance may be placed upon: B.S. Joshi v. State of Haryana, (2003) 4 SCC 675; K. Srinivas Rao v. D.A. Deepa, (2013) 5 SCC 226; Yashpal Chaudhrani and Others vs. State (Govt. of NCT Delhi) and Another, 2019 SCC OnLine Del 8179.
7. Both parties are present in court and have duly been identified by the IO. Respondent No. 2 submits that she has entered the settlement voluntarily without any threat, fear, force, or coercion. She submits that other petitions have already been withdrawn or dismissed. And since the marriage between the parties has also been dissolved by a decree of divorce by mutual consent order/judgment dated 12.12.2022, she has stated that she has no objection if FIR no.572/2021 registered under Section 498A/406 IPC at PS Uttam Nagar and all the proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.
8. I have gone through the settlement dated 02.04.2022 which has been placed on record. The settlement agreement provides for the following terms and conditions:
a. It has been agreed between the parties that the parties shall seek divorce by mutual consent without any monetary consideration.
b. The respondent/husband has agreed and undertaken to return all the articles as mentioned in the list Annexure-A to this settlement, on or before 10.04.2022.
c. Both the parties shall jointly file the first motion petition u/s, 13 B (1) of HMA, within fifteen days after receiving the articles on or before 10.04.2022.
d. Both the parties shall move second motion petition for divorce within fifteen days of the minimum statutory period or any time sooner as per law.
e. The minor child namely Master Ujawal Aror
The court can quash non-compoundable offences after considering the nature of the offence and the amicable settlement between the concerned parties, using inherent powers under section 482 of the Cod....
The court emphasized the use of inherent powers under section 482 of the Code to secure the ends of justice and prevent abuse of the process of any court, particularly in cases of amicable settlement....
The voluntary and amicable nature of a settlement in cases arising from matrimonial differences can be a basis for quashing non-compoundable offences under relevant legal provisions.
The court can exercise inherent powers to quash FIRs in matrimonial disputes based on amicable settlements and mutual divorce decrees.
The court can quash non-compoundable offences arising from matrimonial differences if the parties have reached an amicable settlement.
The importance of amicable settlements in matrimonial disputes and the court's power to quash proceedings under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
The court can quash non-compoundable offences after considering the nature of the offence and the amicable settlement between the concerned parties, especially in cases arising out of matrimonial dif....
The court emphasized the importance of amicable settlements in matrimonial disputes and the exercise of inherent powers under section 482 of the Code to secure the ends of justice.
The court can exercise inherent powers under section 482 of the Code to quash non-compoundable offences, especially in matrimonial disputes, if the parties have reached an amicable settlement.
Courts can quash non-compoundable offences arising from matrimonial disputes if parties have reached an amicable settlement, exercising inherent powers under section 482 of the Code.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.