SWARANA KANTA SHARMA
Rakesh Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of NCT of Delhi – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Swarana Kanta Sharma, J.
1. By way of present petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ('Cr.P.C.'), the petitioner seeks setting aside of order dated 22.02.2020 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-04, South East, Saket Court, New Delhi in Criminal Revision No. 593/2019, and quashing of FIR bearing no. 56/2008 registered at Police Station Lajpat Nagar, New Delhi under Sections 406/420 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC).
2. Briefly stated, the facts of the present case are that respondent no. 2 had lodged a complaint with the police whereby he had stated that he had good relations with the accused persons including the present petitioner and by misusing the same, the petitioner and his brother in May, 2000, had induced the complainant to invest money in their business on the pretext that it would give good returns to the complainant. Upon their insistence, the complainant had invested Rs.1,00,000/-. It was stated that in order to gain trust of the complainant, the accused persons had given him Rs.2,000/- each on two occasions. Thereafter, the complainant had again given Rs.1,56,000/- to the petitioner by taking the same from his friend Satvir
The court emphasized the need for strong suspicion of the accused's guilt at the stage of framing charges and the requirement of exceptional circumstances to quash a charge or FIR.
The power to quash criminal proceedings should be exercised sparingly and only in exceptional cases, and the court cannot interfere with the investigation process unless there are exceptional circums....
The power of quashing criminal proceedings should be exercised sparingly and only in exceptional cases, as per the principles laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court.
Quashing of criminal proceeding – It is no part of business of any of courts to ascertain what outcome of trial could be – Unless prosecution is shown to be illegitimate so as to result in abuse of p....
Rare and exceptional circumstances for interference in order framing charge
The truth or falsity of the allegations in the complaint should not be determined at the earliest stage.
Inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. should be exercised sparingly to prevent abuse of process, and allegations must disclose a cognizable offence for proceedings to continue.
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the continuation of a criminal Prosecution can amount to an abuse of process if the alleged offences are not made out and the dispute has a....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.