SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(P&H) 1750

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Jasjit Singh Bedi, J.
Jaspal Kaur – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab & Ors. – Respondents
CRM-M-1493-2018 (O&M)
Decided On : 21-09-2022

Advocates appeared:
Mr. N.C. Kinra, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Jiteshwar Singh, AAG, Punjab. Mr. V.N. Sharma, Advocate, for the Respondent

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 406, 419, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 120-B - Quashing of FIR - Petition for quashing rejected; sufficient grounds established for proceeding against accused based on allegations of forgery and cheating - Petitioner implicated as co-conspirator without overt evidence of participation - Allegations specifically attribute actions to petitioner supporting prima facie case for trial. (Paras 11, 12, 14, 15)

(B) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 482 - Jurisdiction for quashing - High Court shall not interfere unless allegations are absurd or do not demonstrate basic ingredients of crime; charge can only be quashed if no prima facie case is made out based on record of the case. (Paras 6, 10)

Facts of the case:
Petitioner's husband secured loans deceitfully utilizing complainant's land that was misrepresented, with petitioner allegedly participating in transactions, inducing complainant to facilitate unlawful acts.

Findings of Court:
Charges were framed as sufficient prima facie evidence demonstrated involvement of accused in committing fraud; compelling circumstances justified proceeding further.

Issues: Whether specific role attributed to petitioner warranted quashing of proceedings; the existence of prima facie case for trial against the accused.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court held that mere association of petitioner with main accused did not absolve her of involvement; strong suspicion based on uncontroverted allegations justified trial proceedings.

Result: Petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. quashing of fir and its background. (Para 1 , 2)
2. allegations and pattern of deceit. (Para 3)
3. defense arguments and liability. (Para 4)
4. interim order impact on case proceedings. (Para 5)
5. statements supporting the complainant's case. (Para 6)
6. prosecution's findings and evidence. (Para 7)
7. court's reasoning on trial procedures. (Para 8 , 9)
8. final ruling and trial commencement. (Para 15 , 16)

JUDGMENT

Jasjit Singh Bedi, J. (Oral) - The prayer in the present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is for the quashing of FIR No.107 dated 27.04.2017 under Sections 406 /419/420/465/467/468/471 and 120-B IPC registered at Police Station Dera Bassi, District SAS Nagar, Mohali, order framing charges under Sections 406 , 419, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 120-B, 201 IPC dated 14.07.2017 (Annexure P-5), the charge-sheet dated 14.07.2017 (Annexure P-5/1) and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom.

2. The brief facts of the case are that FIR No. 107 dated 27.04.2017 under Sections 406 /419/420/465/467/468/471 and 120-B IPC, Police Station Dera Bassi, District SAS Nagar, Mohali, came to be registered at the instance of respondent No.3-Jaswinder Kaur, daughter of Asa Singh against Jasmer Singh son of Ajit Singh, Jaspal Kaur wife of Jasmer Singh, Pritpal Singh son of Surmukh Singh and Manjit Kaur wife of Piara Singh. The allegations as extracted from the FIR against the petitioner-Jaspal Kaur and the co-accused are as under:-

    'Jasmer Singh resident of Bal Majra took me to the courts at Rajpura on 18.1.2007. He got the loan of Rs.5,80,000/- from State Bank of Patiala, Khera Gajju Branch, Account No. 65014952087 whereas at the house, he had told for raising a loan of Rs 2,00,000/-, I did not read those papers. The bank officials by visiting the office of the Sub Registrar, Rajpura, got the deed executed for Rs.5,80,000/- in favour of the bank. I was told nothing about it. When I reached home, he came to our house after 2-3 days and enquired from him as to what was the object of recording of Rs.5,80,000/-. He told me that he was her real brother and that there would not be any cheating with her. Thereafter, I kept mum. Now I have come to know that he had done 420 (cheating) with me. When I got the fard of my land, I found that there was an entry of the raising of the loan of Rs 5,80,000/- and it pertained to the Bank branch of Gajju Khera. Reaching there, I and my sister's husband met the manager and checked the record of the bank and found attached a copy of the sale deed and my Aadhar card. He got pasted a joint photo with his wife and got all the signatures of his wife in my place in the bank. And there, by pasting a joint photo of his wife, he has committed cheating whereas the loan was in my name and the address of mine should have been there. He has given the address of Jaswinder Kaur and Jasmer Singh residents of village Bal Majra, Post office, Buha, Tehsil Rajpura, Distt. Patiala and got the entire documents signed from his wife in my place. He himself has been withdrawing the amount and depositing the same himself. On 31.01.2015, he got account No. 65014952087 closed and again got made a fresh limit and its account number is 65014952724. He got a loan of Rs.3,89,000/- by pasting the photo of his wife and here also, he has committing 420 (cheating). In this regard. I gave a letter to the manager and a copy thereof is attached. This was about the committing of cheating by Jasmer Singh and his wife'.

The allegations are that Jasmer Singh, the husband of the petitioner took a loan of Rs.5,80,000/- from State Bank of Patiala, Gajju Khera Branch and he had got pasted a joint photograph of himself with his wife-Jaspal Kaur (petitioner) and Jaspal Kaur had signed in place of the complainant on all the necessary documents of the Bank. The loan was in the name of the complainant but a joint photograph of the petitioner and her husband-Jasmer Singh, had been affixed on the Bank record and the address was given of village Bal M

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top