IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Sanjeev Narula, J.
M/s Hari Chand Shri Gopal – Appellant
Versus
Shib Sakti Gopla Zarda Factory – Respondent
CS(COMM) 49 of 2020
Decided On : 15-05-2023
Trademark Infringement - GOPAL - Trademarks Act, 1999 - Section 132
Fact of the Case:
The Plaintiff, a tobacco products company, sought a permanent injunction against the Defendant for using 'GOURI GREEN' and 'GOURI 700' marks, alleging trademark infringement and passing off. The Defendant imitated the Plaintiff's packaging and marks, leading to the lawsuit.
Finding of the Court:
The Court found the Defendant's products deceptively similar to the Plaintiff's, infringing trademark rights. The Defendant's failure to contest the suit and the uncontroverted evidence led by the Plaintiff established the Plaintiff's entitlement to judgment.
Issues: Trademark infringement, passing off, permanent injunction, damages, costs
Ratio Decidendi: The Defendant's imitation of the Plaintiff's packaging and marks constituted trademark infringement and passing off. The Plaintiff's uncontroverted evidence and continuous use of the trademarks since 1950 supported the judgment in the Plaintiff's favor.
Final Decision: The suit was decreed in favor of the Plaintiff, granting a permanent injunction against the Defendant and ordering the delivery of seized goods for destruction. The Plaintiff was awarded costs but the prayer for damages was not granted due to insufficient evidence.
JUDGMENT
Sanjeev Narula, J. (Oral)--This judgment shall decide a lawsuit initiated by the Plaintiff, a company engaged in the manufacturing and distribution of tobacco products under various versions of the "GOPAL" trademark. The Plaintiff has filed this action seeking a permanent injunction to prohibit the Defendant from using the "GOURI GREEN" or "GOURI 700" marks, alleging that use of such marks by the Defendant constitutes infringement and passing off, resulting in the violation of its registered trademarks and copyright.
PLAINTIFF'S CASE
2. The Plaintiff is a part of the Gopal Group, which was established in 1942 and has since become a prominent player in the manufacturing and sale of tobacco products including, chewing tobacco, zarda, pan-masala, betel spice, pan-chatni. In 1950, the Plaintiff adopted the "GOPAL" mark, named after Mr. Sri Gopal Gupta, the Chairman and Partner, who holds highest stake in the Plaintiff company. Since its adoption, the "GOPAL" mark has been consistently used by the Plaintiff in combination with a logo depicting Lord Krishna playing the flute with a cow in the background, referred to as the "Lord Krishna device" hereinafter. This logo is often accompanied by various prefixes or suffixes to "GOPAL", associated with the afore-mentioned products. Furthermore, the trademark "GOPAL" is an integral and prominently displayed component of the Plaintiff's corporate name and trading style.
3. Over the course of its business operations, the Plaintiff has successfully obtained over a hundred trademark registrations for various forms of the "GOPAL" mark in class 34. Provided below is an illustrative list of the Plaintiff's trademark registrations:
| S.No. | Trademark | Trademark No. | User Date |
| 1. | GOPAL | 331481 | 01/01/1950 |
| 2. | DELUXE GOPAL ZARDA GRENE | 817600 | 01/06/1950 |
| 3. | GOPAL GRENE | 2788698 | 01/04/2012 |
| 4. | GOPAL ZARDA 100 | 817592 | 01/06/1950 |
| 5. | [IMG] | 268260 | 11/11/1970 |
| 6. | [IMG] | 822147 | 01/06/1950 |
| 7. | [IMG] | 338031 | 01/01/1950 |
| 8. | [IMG] | 355316 | 01/01/1968 |
| 9. | [IMG] | 91643 | 01/06/1950 |
| 10. | [IMG] | 916475 | 01/06/1950 |
4. In addition to its trademark rights, Plaintiff also possesses copyright registrations in several of its labels/artistic works, such as "[IMG]", "[IMG]", "[IMG]" and "[IMG]".
5. Plaintiff has developed a series of trade dresses for packaging, pouches, labels and containers of its products, all of which distinctly and prominently display "GOPAL" with the Lord Krishna device. Over the course of seventy years, Plaintiff has consistently employed various versions of "GOPAL" trademarks. On account of widespread use and popularity, evidenced by annual sales of approximately Rs.376.96 crores in 2018-19 and expenditure of Rs.2.49 crores towards promotional activities, Plaintiff is recognised as the sole source of tobacco and related products sold under the "GOPAL" trademarks.
6. The present suit pertains to the imitation of layout, get-up and colour scheme of Plaintiff's "[IMG]" and "[IMG]" products by the Defendant. The Defendant - Shib Shakti Gopla Zarda Factory, produces chewing tobacco under the trademarks "GOURI GREEN" and "GOURI 700", in conjunction with a logo of Lord Shiva. The Plaintiff is also aggrieved with adoption of trade name `Shib Shakti Gopla Zarda Factory', which is deceptively similar to Plaintiff's trademark. Plaintiff's investigation revealed that Defendant had submitted trademark application No. 2837212 to register "[IMG]" in class 34. However, as a result of lack of follow-up actions, the said application has been deemed to be abandoned under Section 132 of the Trademarks Act, 1999, following the order issued by the Trademarks Registry on 14th October, 2017.
7. Hence, the Defendant's decision to adopt the impugned marks and packaging that bear a striking resemblance to the Plaintiff's registered marks, such as "GOPAL", "GOPAL GRENE" and "GOPAL 100" is a clear infringement of Plaintiff's rights. This adoption also violates the Plaintiff's common law rights in the trade get-up.
PROCEEDINGS THIS FAR
8. On 31st January, 2020,
Trademark infringement and passing off were established based on the Defendant's imitation of the Plaintiff's packaging and marks, supported by the Plaintiff's continuous use of trademarks and uncont....
Trademark infringement occurs when a mark is deceptively similar to a registered mark, leading to consumer confusion.
After interim injunction passed by this Court defendants has stopped using trademark of plaintiff and he has sent a letter to plaintiff informing that he is not using trademark “SPS Gopal” any furthe....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the lawfulness of the Settlement Agreement and the parties' undertaking to remain bound by its terms.
Infringing activities and lack of defense by the Defendant can lead to the award of damages and costs in favor of the Plaintiff.
Trademark infringement occurs when the use of a mark or trade-dress creates a likelihood of confusion among consumers; courts uphold the established goodwill of the original trademark holder.
Point of law: Trade mark – copyright - Plaintiff has made out a strong case for grant of injunction protecting the trademark GEM'S GOLD. Documents filed substantiate that the claim of the plaintiff i....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the protection of registered trademarks, the establishment of goodwill and reputation, and the likelihood of confusion among consumers in passin....
Important Point :The use of a trademark that is phonetically and visually similar to a registered trademark can lead to confusion, constituting infringement, especially when dishonest conduct is evid....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.