SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 1689

DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
Deepak Lamba – Appellant
Versus
State (NCT of Delhi) – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Sameer Rai, Advocate, for the Petitioners.
Mr. Pradeep Gahalot, APP, for the State.

JUDGMENT

Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)

1. Present petition has been filed seeking quashing of FIR No. 178/2016 dated 19.03.2016 registered at PS Paschim Vihar under sections 498A/406/34 IPC. The said FIR was lodged at the instance of the respondent No. 2/wife against the petitioners herein.

2. Facts in brief are that the marriage between the petitioner No. 1 and respondent No. 2/complainant was solemnized on 17.12.2012 as per Hindu rights and customs in Delhi. No child was born out of the wedlock. Thereafter, due to temperament differences the parties started residing separately. Consequently, the Respondent No. 2/complainant lodged a complaint with CAW Cell, West Distt, New Delhi, basis which the present F.I.R came to be registered u/s 498A/406/34 IPC at PS Paschim Vihar against the petitioners herein. Chargesheet has been filed and the matter is pending adjudication before the learned MM-02 (Mahila Courts), West District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi.

3. It has been submitted that while the proceedings were underway, with the intervention of family members and well-wishers, the parties settled all their disputes and got recorded a joint statement dated 26.08.2022 in HMA 821 of 201

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top