IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.
Dev Karan & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr. – Respondents
Cr.M.C. 4334 of 2022 & Cr.M.A 17766 of 2022
Decided On : 11-04-2023
Quashing of FIR - Matrimonial Dispute - The court quashed the FIR and subsequent proceedings as the parties had amicably settled their disputes and were living together happily. The court emphasized the importance of putting a quietus to matrimonial disputes through genuine settlements.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner filed for quashing of FIR registered at PS Saket, Delhi, under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC, as the parties had settled their disputes and were living together peacefully. The respondent/wife confirmed the settlement and did not wish to pursue the complaint.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the parties had amicably settled their disputes and were living together happily. The respondent did not wish to pursue the FIR, and the court considered it better to put a quietus to the dispute in matrimonial matters through genuine settlements.
Issues: The issue was whether the FIR and subsequent proceedings should be quashed in light of the amicable settlement between the parties.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the importance of putting a quietus to matrimonial disputes through genuine settlements and cited previous judgments supporting this principle.
Final Decision: The court quashed the FIR and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom, considering the amicable settlement and the respondent's unwillingness to pursue the complaint.
JUDGMENT
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)
1. The present petition has been filed for quashing of FIR No.47/2017 dated 27.01.2017 registered at PS Saket, Delhi, under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC. The said FIR was lodged at the instance of the respondent No. 2/wife against the petitioners herein.
2. Facts in brief are that the marriage between the petitioner No.1namely Dev Karan and respondent No.2/complainant was solemnized on 21.04.2006 as per Hindu rites and customs. Two children were born out of this wedlock. Thereafter owing to temperamental differences respondent no.2/complainant lodged a complaint, on the basis which, the present FIR against the petitioners herein came to be registered. It has been submitted that the Chargesheet has been filed and the matter is pending adjudication before the learned MM Saket Court, South Delhi.
3. Learned Counsel further submits that while the proceedings were underway, both the parties amicably settled all their disputes and started residing together as husband and wife along with their two children at the address of the petitioner No.1.Learned counsel submits that since the parties have settled all their disputes and the complainant does not wish to pursue the present complaint, no useful purpose would be served with the continuation of the present complaint and the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom and seeks quashing of the same. Learned counsel submits that a family settlement dated 31.08.2022 was arrived at between the parties on the following terms and conditions:
"Whereas due to some temperamental issues and misunderstanding, the second party had filed a criminal complaint against the first party by which a case FIR NO 47/17, P.S. Saket, U/s 498A/406/34 IPC has been registered against all the above family members of first party.
And whereas, the police has filed charge sheet before the court of Ld.MM, Saket Court, NEW DELHI against the first party.
And whereas the above case is now pending for framing of charge before the court of Ms. Rashi Raheja, Ld. M.M. Saket Court, and it is fixed now for 07/09/2022.
And whereas the second party Is Jiving happily and peacefully with her husband at her above stated matrimonial house.
And whereas at this stage, with the Intervention of common friends, relatives and well wishers, both the parties have amicably settled their disputes on the following terms and Conditions:
That no members of first party shall create any kinds of problems or difficulties with the second party."
4. The parties are present and have been duly identified by the IO. Respondent No.2/wife has stated that she was married to the petitioner No. 1 namely Dev Karanon 21.04.2006. She has stated that she has amicably settled all the grievances with the petitioners and wants to put a quietus to the same. She further states that pursuant to the settlement, the petitioner No.1 and her are living together as husband and wife, happily and peacefully. She has affirmed the factum of the settlement as recorded on 31.08.2022 between her and the petitioners and states that settlement has been done voluntarily of her own accord without any duress, coercion or undue influence. She does not oppose the prayer made by the petitioners seeking the quashing of the FIR, nor does she want them to be punished in relation thereto. She states that she has no objection if the present FIR and all criminal proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed. The IO has also testified to the fact that the parties are living together.
5. I have considered the submissions and perused the records. The parties have amicably settled all their disputes and are living together as husband and wife happily and peacefully. The complainant/respondent No.2 does not wish to pursue the present FIR. In such circumstances continuance of FIR No. 47/2017 would serve no useful purpose and may cause prejudice to the petitioner and be an exercise in futility. The chances of conviction would also be bleak and remote, given that the co
The importance of putting a quietus to matrimonial disputes through genuine settlements.
Matrimonial disputes should be put to quietus if the parties have arrived upon a genuine settlement.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's authority to quash non-compoundable offences under section 482 of the Code, considering the nature of the offence and the amicable sett....
Cases arising out of matrimonial differences should be put to quietus if the parties have arrived upon a genuine settlement.
Matrimonial disputes should be put to quietus if the parties have arrived upon a genuine settlement.
Matrimonial disputes should be put to quietus if the parties have arrived upon a genuine settlement, and the court should ensure that the settlement is voluntary and without coercion.
Cases arising out of matrimonial differences should be put to quietus if the parties have arrived upon a genuine settlement, as held in B.S. Joshi v. State of Haryana, K. Srinivas Rao v. D.A. Deepa, ....
Courts can exercise inherent powers under section 482 of the Code to quash non-compoundable offences, especially in cases of matrimonial differences where the parties have reached an amicable settlem....
Matrimonial disputes should be put to rest if the parties have arrived at a genuine settlement and obtained a divorce by mutual consent.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.