CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
Mandal And Associates – Appellant
Versus
Hero Fincorp Limited – Respondent
ORDER
Chandra Dhari Singh, J. (Oral)--The instant petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter "Arbitration Act") has been filed on behalf of the petitioners seeking the following reliefs:
"In light of the aforesaid facts and circumstances it is most respectfully prayed that the award dated 29.01.2020 passed by Sole Arbitrator Shri Anshul Garg, Advocate in Arbitration case titled Hero Fincorp Ltd. Versus M/s Mandal & Associates & Ors. being Case Ref. No. HFCL/AG/2019-20-007 be set aside and quashed for being totally non application of mind and against the public policy.
Pass any other orders or directions as may be deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the case."
2. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the respondent sanctioned a loan of Rs.3,64,21,000/- in favour of the petitioners vide Sanction Letter bearing reference No. 1779613 dated 28th February 2017. Subsequently, the parties entered into two Loan Agreements dated 28th February 2017 on mutually agreed and acknowledged terms and conditions for disbursement of first tranche of the loan of Rs.3,30,66,000/- of the said loan amount within 180 months along with inter
Anand Brothers (P) Ltd. vs. Union of India & Ors.
Associate Builders vs. Delhi Development Authority
Delhi Airport Metro Express Pvt. Ltd. vs. Delhi Metro Rail Corporation
Limited grounds for setting aside an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act and the Court's reluctance to re-adjudicate disputes on their merits.
The limited scope of intervention by Courts in arbitral awards under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, emphasizing the need to satisfy specific grounds for setting aside an arbitral....
Limited grounds for interference with an Arbitral Award under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act
Limited scope of interference and intervention by a Court in an Arbitral Award.
The scope of judicial review of an arbitral award is limited. The Court will not interfere with an arbitral award unless it is patently illegal, in contravention of the fundamental policy of India, o....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the significance of adhering to the prescribed limitation period under the Arbitration Act and the requirement for parties to exercise their rights....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.