CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
Seema Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Sunny Talwani – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition details and factual background. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. dispute over existence and execution of agreement to sell. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 19 , 20) |
| 3. scope of court's interference under arbitration act. (Para 34 , 70 , 80 , 86) |
| 4. conclusion to dismiss the petition. (Para 87 , 88 , 89) |
JUDGMENT :
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
The instant petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 read with Section 10 of the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Act , 2015 has been filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking the following reliefs:—
(b) The record may be summoned from the Ld. Arbitrator; and/or
(c) Any other relief as the Hon'ble Court may deem fit in the interest of the justice may be granted to the Petitioner.”
BACKGROUND
2. A perusal of the record reveals that the following course of events has led to the filing of the instant petition:—
Anand Brothers (P) Ltd. v. Union of India
Delhi Airport Metro Express Pvt. Ltd. v. Delhi Metro Rail Corporation
Katta Sujatha Reddy v. Siddamsetty Infra Projects (P) Ltd.
N.P. Thirugnanam v. Dr. R. Jagan Mohan Rao
Silvey v. Arun Varghese reported at (2008) 11 SCC 45
State of Chhattisgarh v. Sal Udyog (P) Ltd.
State of Jharkhand v. HSS Integrated DSN
UHL Power Co. Ltd. v. State of Himachal Pradesh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.