IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.
Naresh Guliya @ Naresh Singh – Appellant
Versus
The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr. – Respondents
Cr.M.C. 5080 of 2022
Decided On : 25-04-2023
Quashing - Settlement - The court quashed the FIR and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom based on a settlement reached between the parties, considering the close relationship between the parties and the likelihood of better relations resulting from the settlement.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner filed a petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No. 360/2019, alleging sexual harassment. The parties reached a settlement, and the complainant submitted that the settlement was voluntary.
Finding of the Court:
The court considered the settlement and the close relationship between the parties, and quashed the FIR and all consequential proceedings, subject to a cost of Rs.30,000/- to be deposited within four weeks with the DLSA.
Issues: Quashing of FIR and consequential proceedings based on settlement and close relationship between the parties.
Ratio Decidendi: The court may exercise power under section 482 CrPC for quashing the proceedings if the chances of an ultimate conviction are bleak and a settlement between the parties would lead to better relations. However, the court does not encourage the trend of getting FIR lodged with such allegations and then approaching the judicial system for getting the same quashed.
Final Decision: The court quashed the FIR and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom, subject to the cost of Rs.30,000/- to be deposited within four weeks with the DLSA.
JUDGMENT
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)
CRL.M.A. 20294/2022
Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions.
CRL.M.C. 5080/2022
1. This is a petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No. 360/2019, dated 02.12.2019, registered under sections 354/509/506 Indian Penal Code, 1860, at PS Malviya Nagar and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom.
2. Briefly stated facts of the case are that the above-mentioned FIR was lodged on the statement of respondent No. 2 alleging therein that the petitioner herein has sexual harassed her on several occasions. It is alleged that the Petitioner herein has made threats to her of picking her up from her house, has abused her and made dirty gestures to her.
3. However, it is submitted that now the parties have reached at a settlement vide settlement deed dated 22.04.2022. The same has been placed on record.
4. The terms and conditions of the compromise/settlement dated 22.04.2022 are as follows-
"1. That the First Party undertakes that she shall filed an application to not to proceed her complaint dated 3.8.21 before the Police Station Malviya Nagar and further undertakes to make a statement to withdrawn her complaint dated 3.8.21 if required.
2. That the second party undertakes to file quashing petition U/s 482 Cr.P.C. before the Hon'ble High court of New Delhi for quashing the FIR no. 360/2019 dated 02.12.2019 under section 354/509/506 IPC registered with Police station Malviya Nagar and first party undertakes to file no objection or affidavit stating that she has no objection if the present FIR no. 360/2019 dated 02.12.2019 under section 354/509/506 IPC registered with Police station Malviya Nagar may be quashed. It is mutually undertaken that the First Parties would present themselves at the time of Court hearing to make requisite statements for withdrawal/compromise/quashing of the proceedings in the above noted case.
3. That the both parties undertake that they shall not raise any claim or make any complaints against each other.
4. That the parties have also mutually settled that the complaint/petition, if any, filed by either party shall also stand withdrawn/compromised leaving the parties to lead their lives in the manner they chose so & no future claim would be raised by either party thereafter and all disputes/claims/complaints shall stand compromised fully and finally."
5. Complainant is present in the Court and submits that the petitioner is a member of her close family and with the intervention of the elders, she has reached on the settlement voluntarily without any fear, force and coercion.
6. It has been repeatedly held by the Apex Court and this court that when the chances of an ultimate conviction are bleak and, therefore, no useful purpose is likely to be served by allowing a criminal prosecution to continue, and where the court may be of the opinion that a settlement between the parties would lead to better relations between them, the court may exercise power under section 482 CrPC for quashing the proceedings or the complaint or the FIR as the case may be.
7. However, though this court does not encourage such trend of getting FIR lodged with such allegations and then approaching the judicial system for getting the same quashed as it not only burdens the judicial system but also sends out a wrong message. But the facts of this case are peculiar in nature as the parties are closely related to each other. The Court considers that in such circumstances further continuance of these proceedings will further damage the close relations.
8. In the view of the above facts and circumstances the case FIR No. 360/2019, dated 02.12.2019, registered under sections 354/509/506 Indian Penal Code, 1860, at PS Malviya Nagar and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom is quashed subject to the cost of Rs.30,000/- to be deposited within four weeks with the DLSA.
9. The present petition is disposed of.
The court may quash proceedings if a settlement between the parties would lead to better relations and the chances of an ultimate conviction are bleak.
The court may quash proceedings if the chances of conviction are bleak and a settlement between the parties would lead to better relations.
The court may quash proceedings under section 482 CrPC if a settlement between the parties would lead to better relations and the chances of conviction are bleak. However, the trend of lodging FIRs a....
The court can quash non-compoundable offences after considering the nature of the offence, the gravity of the case, and the amicable settlement between the concerned parties.
The court may quash proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C if a settlement between the parties would lead to better relations and the chances of conviction are bleak.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that heinous and serious offences, especially those under Section 376 IPC, cannot be quashed based on a settlement between the parties, as they hav....
The court has the inherent power to quash criminal proceedings, even in non-compoundable cases, if it serves the ends of justice and prevents abuse of the court's process.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that heinous and serious offences like rape, which have a serious impact on society, cannot be quashed based on a settlement between the parties.
High Court may quash the criminal proceeding if in view of the compromise between the disputants, the possibility of a conviction is remote and the continuation of a criminal proceeding would cause o....
The court may quash criminal proceedings under section 482 CrPC when the chances of conviction are bleak and no useful purpose is likely to be served by allowing the prosecution to continue.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.