IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.
Shyam Kishore Singh – Appellant
Versus
Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors. – Respondents
Cr.M.C. 4648 of 2023 & Cr.M.A. 17735 of 2023
Decided On : 11-07-2023
Section 482 Cr.P.C - Quashing of FIR - Settlement between parties
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner filed a petition seeking quashing of a case FIR under Section 354/323 IPC, as the parties had reached a settlement and the complainant did not want to continue with the case.
Finding of the Court:
The court, while exercising the power under Section 482 Cr.P.C, considered the settlement between the parties and the voluntary withdrawal of allegations by the complainant. It held that there would be no purpose of continuing with the proceedings and quashed the FIR and all other proceedings emanating therefrom.
Issues: Quashing of FIR under Section 482 Cr.P.C based on settlement between parties
Ratio Decidendi: The court may exercise power under Section 482 Cr.P.C for quashing the proceedings if the chances of an ultimate conviction are bleak and a settlement between the parties would lead to better relations between them.
Final Decision: FIR No. 128/2014 under Section 354/323 IPC registered at P.S. Yamuna Depot, district: Railway and Metro and all the other proceeding emanating therefrom are quashed.
JUDGMENT
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)
Crl.M.A. 17734/2023
Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions.
CRL.M.C. 4648/2023
1. The present petition has been filed seeking under section 482 Cr.P.C seeking quashing of case FIR No. 128/2014 under Section 354/323 IPC registered at P.S. Yamuna Depot, district: Railway and Metro.
2. The briefly stated facts of the case are that a FIR was lodged on the statement of Ms. Kanchan D/O Suresh Chand wherein she alleged that while she and her sister were going home through metro and while boarding the metro one boy started scuffling with them and also started to pull their hair and collar. It is alleged that the petitioner also molested the respondent.
3. It has been stated that the charge-sheet has already been filed.
4. However, both the parties state that they have reached on a settlement/Memo of understanding on 02.06.2023 with the following terms and conditions:
"1. That on 19.07.2014, upon allegation of the first parties an F.I.R. bearing no. 128/2014 with P.S: Yamuna Depot, Dist.: Railway and Metro under section 354, 323 IPC was registered against the second party. The trial of the above numbered F.LR. is going on before the Hon'ble Court of Ms.Shruti Chaudhary, M.M, East, Delhi and Now the same is fixed for evidence of the first parties.
2. That by the intervention of the elders of the society and also their kith and kin, all the parties has settled their all disputes and the First parties willingly and without any pressure, force and coercion of any nature have become ready to withdraw all her allegations leveled against the Second parties.
3. That without prejudice to the right, defense of the second party before the Trial court and contention, the second party has agreed to make a payment of Rs. l,50,000/-(Rupees one lakh Fifty thousand only) to the first parties in total and out of that Rs. 20,000/- (Rs. Twenty thousand has been paid on 4th of July 2023 at the time of signing the documents and rest of the money will be paid before the Hon'ble High court.
4. That both the parties have entered into this Memo of Understanding with their own choice and willingness. The first parties and second party have appended their signature and thumb impression herewith after understanding draft of this MEMO OF UNDERSTANDING/AGREEMENT in their vernacular language. All the parties have consented herewith without force and coercion of any nature."
5. As per the terms of settlement a total sum of Rs. 1,50,000 has to be paid to the respondent as full and final settlement of the case has already been paid to the Respondent.
6. IO is present in the court today and has duly identified the parties.
7. The complainant and Ms. K. have also filed an affidavit which states that they are making the statement voluntarily without any fear, force or coercion. It is also stated that complainant has entered into settlement amicably and does not want to continue with the present petition and FIR No. 128/2014 under Section 354/323 IPC registered at P.S. Yamuna Depot, district: Railway and Metro and proceeding emanating therefrom be quashed.
8. Section 482 Cr.P.C. pre-supposes three circumstances under which the inherent jurisdiction may be exercised, i.e., (i) to give effect to an order (ii) to prevent the abuse of the process of court and (iii) to otherwise secure the ends of justice. The court while exercising the power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. does not function as a court of appeal or revision. The powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C., are of wide plenitude but have to be exercised sparingly with caution and only in the event when aforesaid three conditions are satisfied. The object behind the exercise of such power should be to do real and substantial justice for the administration of which the courts exist.
9. It has been repeatedly held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court and this court that when the chances of an ultimate conviction are bleak and, therefore, no useful purpose is likely to be served by allowing a
The court may quash proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C if a settlement between the parties would lead to better relations and the chances of conviction are bleak.
The court may exercise its power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash criminal proceedings when a settlement between the parties would lead to better relations and no useful purpose would be served by ....
The court can exercise its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash criminal proceedings if the possibility of conviction is remote and bleak, and continuation of the case would be an abuse ....
The court may quash proceedings if a settlement between the parties would lead to better relations and the chances of an ultimate conviction are bleak.
The wide plenitude of inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C allows for the quashing of criminal proceedings based on settlement and the remote possibility of conviction.
The court may exercise power under Section 482 Cr.P.C to quash criminal proceedings when the chances of an ultimate conviction are bleak, and a settlement between the parties would lead to better rel....
The court may quash proceedings if the chances of conviction are bleak and a settlement between the parties would lead to better relations.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that heinous and serious offences, especially those under Section 376 IPC, cannot be quashed based on a settlement between the parties, as they hav....
The power to quash criminal proceedings based on a settlement between the parties depends on the facts and circumstances of each case, and the court must consider the nature and gravity of the crime,....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that heinous and serious offences like rape, which have a serious impact on society, cannot be quashed based on a settlement between the parties.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.