SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 5218

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Mukta Gupta, Poonam A. Bamba, JJ.
Sunil Alias Sonu – Appellant
Versus
The State of Delhi – Respondent
Cr.A. 408 of 2018 & 137 of 2018
Decided On : 26-06-2023

Advocates appeared:
Mr.Anwesh Madhukar, Advocate (DHCLSC) with Mr.Yaseen Siddiqui, Ms.PrachiNirwan and Mr.Pranjal Shekhar, Advocates, for the Appellant in CRL.A. 408/2018 and CRL.A. 137/2018.
Ms.Shubhi Gupta, APP, for the State with Inspector Dharmender Kumar, P.S.Jahangir Puri in CRL.A. 408/2018 and CRL.A. 137/2018.

The main legal point established in the judgment is that delay in lodging the FIR is not fatal to the prosecution case if satisfactorily explained, and the importance of eye-witness testimony and corroboration with other evidence.

Headnote:

Murder - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 302/34 - Section 323/34 - Section 307/34 - The court discussed the evidence of eye-witnesses, the post mortem report, and the delay in lodging the FIR. The appellants were found guilty for the murder of the deceased and causing simple injury on another person. They were sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for life and simple imprisonment.

Fact of the Case:

On 28th November, 2016, the appellants were involved in an altercation with the deceased and another person, resulting in the murder of the deceased and causing injuries to the other person. The deceased was assaulted with knife blows and danda blows, leading to his death. The appellants were arrested and charged under relevant sections of the Indian Penal Code.

Finding of the Court:

The court found the appellants guilty based on the testimony of eye-witnesses, the post mortem report, and the delay in lodging the FIR. The court rejected the defense's claim of self-inflicted injury and the possibility of a counter-blast FIR. The court upheld the conviction and the sentence imposed on the appellants.

Issues: The issues revolved around the credibility of the eye-witnesses, the nature of injuries inflicted, and the delay in lodging the FIR. The defense raised concerns about the delay in lodging the FIR and the possibility of a counter-blast FIR.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that delay in lodging the FIR is not fatal to the prosecution case if satisfactorily explained. The court also highlighted the importance of eye-witness testimony and the need for corroboration with other evidence. The court rejected the defense's claims and relied on the consistent testimony of the eye-witnesses and the medical evidence.

Final Decision: The court upheld the conviction and the sentence imposed on the appellants, dismissing their appeals.

JUDGMENT

Mukta Gupta, J.

1. By way of these appeals, the appellants challenge the common judgment of learned Trial Court dated 25th October, 2017 whereby the appellants were held guilty for the murder of one Sachin ("deceased"). The appellants also challenge the order on sentence dated 6th November, 2017 whereby the appellants were directed to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life along with fine of Rs.10,000/- each, in default whereof simple imprisonment for 1 year for offence punishable under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ("IPC").

2. Vide the aforesaid impugned judgment and order on sentence, two other accused persons namely, Satish and Gaurav were also held guilty for offence punishable under Section 323/34 IPC for causing simple injury on Rahul and were directed to undergo simple imprisonment of 4 months along with fine of Rs.1000/- each in default whereof simple imprisonment for 1 month. These two accused persons had already undergone their period of sentence.

3. Brief facts of the prosecution case are that on 28th November, 2016, Rahul (PW-1) along with his friend/deceased was going to the house of his mausi Shivani (PW-2) who was residing in a street No.700. Accused Chotu @Satish was having a small mechanic shop in the corner of street No.600 and Sunil @ Sonu, Gaurav @ Bakra and Nitin @ Mota were standing in front of the said mechanic shop under the influence of liquor. At about 8.45-9 PM, while Rahul was talking to his mausi, Gaurav called deceased and as the deceased went up to Gaurav, Gaurav started arguing and abusing the deceased. Thereafter, Gaurav and Nitin caught the deceased from his neck and when Rahul tried to save the deceased, Chotu and Gaurav gave danda blows on Rahul's head. Nitin and Sachin started beating the deceased with kicks and fists blows and thereafter, Nitin pulled out a knife and on seeing the knife, the deceased started running to save his life. Thereafter, Sonu and Nitin chased the deceased and caught hold of him at the pulia of gandanala of EE Block and inflicted knife blows on the deceased. In an attempt to save Rahul, Shivani intervened and covered Rahul, but she was pulled and dashed to the ground. Thereafter, both Chotu and Gaurav went up to the place where the deceased was beaten and they also started beating the deceased. A police official namely ASI Subhash Chandra (PW-15) was passing by the street, whom Shivani forcibly stopped, sought his help and took him to the place where the deceased was being beaten up. On seeing ASI Subhash (PW-15), all the four accused persons ran away and Shivani made repeated calls at No.100. One PCR van removed Rahul to the hospital and another PCR van removed the deceased to the hospital. Information given to the police was recorded by DD No.63A (Ex.PW-19/A) which was marked to SI Suresh (PW-19) who reached the spot and thereafter, went to BJRM Hospital. At the hospital, Rahul could not be found and the deceased was found unfit for statement. Search was made for eye-witness Rahul, however, he could not be found and on 29th November, 2016, at about 11.45 PM, Rahul himself came to the police station where his statement (Ex.PW-1/A) was recorded on which rukka (Ex.PW-19/D) was prepared and FIR No.667/2016 dated 30th November, 2016 under Section 307/34 IPC was registered at PS Jahangir Puri (Ex.PW-20/A). Thereafter, efforts were made to search the accused persons, and behind PRAYAS Home, EE Block, Jahangir Puri all the four boys/accused persons were found sitting and pursuant to identification by Rahul and their interrogation, all the four boys/accused persons, Sunil @ Sonu, Satish, Gaurav and Nitin were arrested vide arrest memos Ex.PW-1/A-1, Ex.PW-1/B-1, Ex.PW-1/C-1 and Ex.PW- 1/D-1 respectively. Disclosure statements of the accused persons (Ex.PW-19/F- 1, Ex.PW-19/F-2, Ex.PW-19/F-3 and Ex.PW-19/F-4 respectively) were also recorded. On 2nd December, 2016 at about 7.35 AM, an information vide DD No.12A (EX.PW-19/H) was received regarding de

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top