SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 5189

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.
Manish Sisodia – Appellant
Versus
Directorate of Enforcement – Respondent
Bail Appln. 1478 of 2023
Decided On : 03-07-2023

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Mohit Mathur, Senior Advocate & Mr.Dayan Krishnan, Senior Advocate with Mr.Vivek Jain, Mr. Mohd. Irshad, Mr. Mohit Siwach, Mr. Karan Sharma, Mr.Rishikesh Kumar, Mr. Aditya Raj, Mr.Harsh Gautam, Mr.Abhinav Jain, Mr.Rajat Jain, Mr.Mayank Sharma and Mr.Rishabh Sharma, Advocates, for the Petitioner.
Mr. S.V. Raju, ASG with Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Special counsel for ED and Mr. Vivek Gumani, Mr. Ankit Bhatia, Mr. Bhaibhav, Mr.Harsh Paul Singh and Mr. Kartik Sabarwal, Advocates, for the Respondent.

Headnote:(A) Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Section 7 - Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 - Section 3 - Allegations of large-scale corruption in framing the excise policy, resulting in undue financial benefits to private entities and the misuse of public office by the accused - The petitioner was accused of being a key conspirator in overseeing a fraudulent excise policy that allegedly facilitated bribery and kickbacks - The plea for bail was dismissed as the court found reasonable grounds for the allegations. (Paras 3, 11, 43, 46, 71, 78)

(B) Money Laundering - Definition and Scope - Direct involvement in any process connected with proceeds of crime constitutes a guilty act of money laundering as per Section 3 of PMLA. (Paras 43-45)

(C) Bail: Economic Offences - Different approach required in granting bail for economic offences; pretrial detention must consider individual and societal interests, particularly in severe allegations involving public funds. (Paras 48-50)

Facts of the case:
The bail application concerns a key accused in a corruption case involving the excise policy of GNCTD, alleging collusion with private stakeholders for personal gain, with kickbacks utilized for political campaign funding. (Paras 3-10)

Findings of Court:
The court observed that the gravity of allegations and the public position of the accused warranted denial of bail, further noting insufficient grounds for necessitating his release. (Paras 59-78)

Issues: Whether the applicant is entitled to bail, considering the serious allegations of money laundering and the evidence of conspiracy. (Paras 78)

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that even if direct evidence is scarce, the intertwining of actions supporting the fraud suggests significant implication for the accused, thereby justifying the bail denial. (Paras 50, 78)

Result: Petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. factual background of bail application and fir details. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 10)
2. arguments regarding lack of evidence against applicant. (Para 4 , 6 , 7 , 11 , 12 , 14 , 21)
3. discussion on evidentiary standards in pmla bail cases. (Para 20 , 22 , 46 , 70)
4. interpreting the offense of money laundering under pmla. (Para 43 , 44 , 54 , 72)
5. court's rationale for denying bail to accused. (Para 61 , 79)

JUDGMENT

INDEX

S. No.ParticularsPage No.
1.Factual Matrix2-17
2.Submissions on behalf of Petitioner17-32
3.Submissions on behalf of Respondent/ED32-37
4.Finding and Analysis37-56

Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.

A. FACTUAL MATRIX

1. The present judgment shall dispose of the bail application no. 1478/2023 of Sh. Manish Sisodia. The bail application of Manish Sisodia was dismissed by the learned Special Judge vide order dated 28.04.2023.

2. The bail applications filed by petitioner Benoy Babu was dismissed by the learned Special Judge, PC Act, CBI-09 vide order dated 16.02.2023.

3. Briefly the facts as stated by Enforcement Directorate are as under:

    "5. An FIR No. RC0032022A0053 dated 17.08.2022 was registered by CBI, ACB, New Delhi against Sh. Manish Sisodia, Deputy Chief Minister, GNCTD of Delhi and others under Section 120B r/w 477A of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 7 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for irregularities in framing and implementation of the excise policy of GNCTD of Delhi for the year 2021-22.

    6. The FIR is registered on the direction of competent authority conveyed by Shri Praveen Kumar Rai, Director, MHA, Govt. Of India vide OM No. 14035/06/2022-Delhi-1 dated 22/07/22 for enquiry into the matter of irregularities in framing and implementation of the excise policy of GNCTD of Delhi for the year 2021-22. Vide said OM Shri Praveen Kumar Rai has also forwarded DO letter no. SLG/Conf./2022/75 dated 20/07/2022 of Shri Vinai Kumar Saxena, Hon'ble Lt. Governor, GNCTD of Delhi alleging irregularities in framing and implementation of the excise policy of GNCTD of Delhi for the year 2021-22.

    7. The OM discloses that Shri Manish Sisodia, Deputy Chief Minister, GNCTD of Delhi, Shri Arva Gopi Krishna, the then Commissioner (Excise), GNCTD of Delhi and Shri Pankaj Bhatnagar, Assistant Commissioner (Exicse), GNCTD of Delhi were instrumental in recommending and taking decisions pertaining to excise policy for the year 2021-22 without approval of competent authority with an intention to extend undue favors to the licensees post tender.

    8. In the said FIR it has been inter-alia stated/alleged that:

    a. Sh. Vijay Nair, Former CEO of M/s Only Much Louder, an entertainment and event management company, Shri Manoj Rai, Ex-employee of M/s Pernod Ricard, Sh. Amandeep Dhall, Owner of M/s Brindco Spirits & Sh. Sameer Mahendru. Owner of M/s Indo Spirits are actively involved in irregularities in framing and implementation of excise policy of GNCTD of Delhi for the year 2021-22.

    b. Some of the L-1 Licence holders are issuing credits notes to retail vendors with an ab-initio intention to divert the funds as undue pecuniary advantage to Public Servants. In furtherance to this, they are showing false entries in their books of accounts to keep their record straight.

    c. Shri Amit Arora, Director of M/s Buddy Retail Pvt. Limited, 1402, Tower-15, Vipul Greens, Gurgaon. Haryana, Shri Dinesh Arora R/o Plot No.-139, III Floor. Block-A. Gujrawala Town, Phase-I. Delhi. Shri Arjun Pandey are close associates of Shri Manish Sisodia and are actively involved in managing and diverting the undue pecuniary advantage collected from Liquor Licensees to accused public servants. That Shri Sameer Mahendru, MD. M/s Indospirits has transferred an amount of one crore to account no. 10220210004647 of M/s Radha Industries maintained with UCO Bank. Rajendra Place, New Delhi. M/s Radha Industries is being managed by Shri Dinesh Arora. That Shri Arun Ramchandra Pillai used to collect undue pecuniary advantage from Shri Sameer Mahendru, MD. M/s Indospirit for onward

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top