Back
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
Surpreet Singh Alias Rishu – Appellant
Versus
State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)
1. The present petition has been filed seeking quashing of case FIR No. 0044/2021 registered with police station Mayapuri against the petitioner under sections 285/336/337 of I.P.C.
2. Briefly stated facts of the case are that the present FIR no. 44/2021 was lodged on the statement of Respondent No.3/Complainant alleging therein that on 18.03.2021 his brother Vishwanath/ Respondent No.2 was doing the work of CNG Kit packing at the shop owned by Surpreet Singh/Petitioner. It is alleged that when Respondent no.3 reached the shop, he saw Petitioner was trying to open a valve of the CNG Cylinder kit. It is further alleged that when the petitioner was trying to open the valve suddenly a blast occurred from the said cylinder kit and valve hit the head of Respondent No.2. It is stated that Petitioner immediately took Respondent no.2 to the DDU Hospital. Upon reaching the Hospital Complainant/Respondent No.3 found out that the petitioner wrongly informed the Doctor that the injured had met with a road accident and he left the hospital. Upon this the FIR was lodged.
3. It is submitted that vide order dated 25.05.2023, the matter was referred to the
The court may exercise power under section 482 CrPC to quash criminal proceedings when the chances of conviction are bleak and a settlement between the parties would lead to better relations.
The court can exercise its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash criminal proceedings if the possibility of conviction is remote and bleak, and continuation of the case would be an abuse ....
The court can quash criminal proceedings based on a settlement when the possibility of conviction is remote and continuation of the case would cause injustice to the accused.
The court may quash criminal proceedings if a settlement between the parties would lead to better relations and the chances of conviction are bleak.
The power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. should be exercised to secure the ends of justice and prevent abuse of the process of any court. The possibility of conviction being remote and bleak due to a sett....
The court may quash non-compoundable offences when there is a personal settlement between parties, provided it does not impact societal interests.
The court's power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. should be exercised sparingly and with caution, and a settlement between the parties that would lead to better relations may be a valid reason for quashing....
The court has the power to quash criminal proceedings under section 482 Cr.P.C. when the chances of conviction are bleak and a settlement between the parties would lead to better relations.
The court may quash criminal proceedings under section 482 CrPC when the chances of conviction are bleak and no useful purpose is likely to be served by allowing the prosecution to continue.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
