IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Sanjeev Sachdeva, Manoj Jain, JJ.
Mohan Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India, & Ors. – Respondents
W.P.(C) 8760 of 2023 & CM APPL. 33125 of 2023
Decided On : 06-07-2023
Medical Unfitness - Indian Coast Guard Recruitment - [Notification, Medical Examination, Military Service] - The court discussed the stipulations of the medical examination process for Indian Coast Guard recruitment, emphasizing the finality of the medical report from INS Chilka and the expertise of the medical specialists. The court held that it cannot substitute its view for the opinion of the experts and found no reason to interfere with the decision to declare the petitioner unfit for military service.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner challenged the decision of the respondent in declaring the petitioner medically unfit for recruitment to the Indian Coast Guard due to a medical condition affecting the upper limb.
Finding of the Court:
The court found no reason to interfere with the decision to declare the petitioner unfit for military service, emphasizing the expertise of the medical specialists and the finality of the medical report from INS Chilka.
Issues: Challenge to medical unfitness decision for Indian Coast Guard recruitment based on a medical condition affecting the upper limb.
Ratio Decidendi: The court cannot substitute its view for the opinion of the experts, and the finality of the medical report from INS Chilka was emphasized.
Final Decision: The petition was dismissed, and the decision to declare the petitioner unfit for military service was upheld.
JUDGMENT
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. (Oral)
1. Petitioner impugns the decision of the respondent in declaring the petition medically unfit.
2. Petitioner had applied pursuant to a notification issued by the respondent for recruitment to post of Navik (D), Navik (Domestic Branch) and Yantrik in the Indian Coast Guard.
3. Petitioner appeared for the Coast Guard Navik (Domestic Branch) stage I and II examinations and cleared the same. Petitioner was thereafter called for stage III (induction programme) which inter alia includes medical examination.
4. The subject notification for stage II stipulates an Initial Medical Examination (Provisionally Pass or Fail). The initial medical examination is conducted at the place of recruitment and is valid for a period of six months and candidates are required to undergo another initial medical examination if the recruitment process is delayed due to any unforeseen event.
5. Petitioner was initially subjected to primary medical examination as part of the stage II process and was declared temporary unfit for "left ear Utomycosis and overweight".
6. On 09.01.2023, petitioner filed a review and the Review Board certified the petitioner as medically fit on 25.02.2023.
7. Subject notification for stage III inter alia prescribes final medical at INS Chilka.
8. The conditions stipulated is as under:
"(ii) Final Medicals of INS Chilka. Final Medical Examination (Review Medicals as part of Final Medical (Provisionally `Pass' or `Fail') of all selected candidates will be done at INS Chilka. Candidates, who are not found medically fit in the final medical examination at INS Chilka, will NOT be enrolled for training. "An Appeal" is permitted for medical medically unfit candidates after the final enrolment medical examination at INS Chilka and will be given an opportunity to appeal against the findings. If they so desire at a Military Hospital as decided by the Coast Guard `within a maximum period of 12 days or as decided by INS Chilka. The candidate will travel to the selected Military Hospital and back on their own expense for Appeal Medical Examination."
9. The condition stipulates that medical of all selected candidates would be done at INS Chilka and candidates, who are not found medically fit, shall not be enrolled for training. An appeal is permitted for medically unfit candidates.
10. The stipulation of a final medical at INS Chilka as part of stage III, which is to be conducted after the initial medical examination conducted at stage II, shows that the final medical at INS Chilka shall override the initial medical examination conducted at the place of recruitment.
11. The condition stipulated is very clear i.e, that the medical report of INS Chilka shall be final and binding.
12. Petitioner after having been declared initially medically fit by the Review Board at the place of the recruitment was subjected to final medical at INS Chilka. In the primary medical examination, conducted on 26.05.2023, petitioner was declared as unfit for "upper limb- CUBITIUS VALGUS". Petitioner thereafter filed an appeal in terms of the above referred conditions.
13. Petitioner was directed to report to INHS Kalyani, Visakhapatnam on 15.06.2023. Petitioner was once again examined by the specialists who on re-examination on 15.06.2023 declared the petitioner as unfit "CUBITIUS VALGUS" bilateral and reported the bilateral carrying angle as greater than 20 degrees.
14. The initial medical examination of the petitioner conducted at INHS Nivarini shows the petitioner as unfit and the appellate medical examination at INHS Kalyani, Visakhapatnam also confirmed the said findings.
15. There is no reason for us to take a view different from the two Medical Boards specially constituted for the said purpose in the terms of the notification which have declared the petitioner as unfit.
16. It is settled position of law that the High Court does not sit as a Court of Appeal over the opinion of experts. The Medical Board compr
The final medical examination at INS Chilka shall override the initial medical examination conducted at the place of recruitment, and the court does not substitute its view for the opinion of medical....
The opinion of the medical experts of the appointing authority shall prevail, and the parameters of fitness and required standards for appointment in the Indian Navy cannot be judicially reviewed.
The absence of clear guidelines indicating the refusal of a person to be examined by an Appeal Medical Board after being declared medically unfit by a specialist in a Review Medical Board.
The determination of medical fitness for military recruitment should be upheld unless substantial evidence of error or mala fides is presented against the medical boards' findings.
Medical Board decisions on fitness for military service are final, and significant delays in challenging such decisions can result in the dismissal of petitions for relief.
The judgment established the principle that the armed forces' doctors are the ultimate authority in assessing candidates' medical fitness for armed forces recruitment, and their findings should not b....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the medical fitness for enrollment in the Indian Navy is determined based on specific medical conditions identified by the Appeal Medical Boar....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the importance of adhering to the opinions of the Armed Forces/Navy specialists in matters of medical fitness for recruitment, particularly in t....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.