SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, AMIT BANSAL
Ashish Kumar Pandey – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petitioner's medical examination findings. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
2. procedural requirements for review. (Para 6 , 7 , 10)
3. delay in filing impacts petition. (Para 12 , 13)
4. legal standards for medical fitness. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)

ORDER

[VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING]

CM No.18312/2021 (for exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions and as per extant rules.

2. The application is disposed of.

W.P.(C) 5847/2021

3. This petition has been filed, impugning the findings of the Medical Board and the Appeal Medical Board and seeking mandamus, directing the respondent no.1 Union of India (UOI) and respondent no.2 Directorate General of Recruiting, Adjutant General's Branch, Integrated Headquarters of Ministry of Defence, to convene a Review Medical Board for examination of the petitioner and to appoint the petitioner on the basis of medical certificates issued by the government hospitals.

4. It is the case of the petitioner, (a) that pursuant to the Notification dated 7th August, 2019 inviting applications for admission to the Army, Navy and Air Force wings of the National Defence Academy for the 144th Course, and for the 106th Indian Naval Academy Course, the petit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top