Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, NAVIN CHAWLA
Kshem Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's medical examination and unfitness. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. regulation 482's applicability and duty to review. (Para 3 , 7) |
| 3. court's directives regarding appeal medical board. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 8) |
| 4. court's rationale on medical fitness and review denial. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. final dismissal of the petition. (Para 14) |
JUDGMENT
Navin Chawla, J. (Oral)--This petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for a writ of mandamus directing the respondent no. 1 to constitute a Review Medical Board to examine the petitioner for his recruitment as a Sailor [AA], Sailor [SSR]-08/2020 Batch.
2. The respondent no. 2 invited applications online for recruitment as a Sailor [AA], Sailor [SSR]-08/2020 Batch. The petitioner applied against the same and on clearing written examination, underwent a medical examination at the Recruiting Medical Office at INS Chilka. The petitioner was declared medically unfit vide referral order dated 03.02.2021 for Naval Service due to `2nd Toe Deformity Both Legs'. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner was examined by the Appeal Medical Board on 23.02.2021, however, was orally declared unfit. The petitioner filed a rep
The determination of medical fitness for military recruitment should be upheld unless substantial evidence of error or mala fides is presented against the medical boards' findings.
Medical Board decisions on fitness for military service are final, and significant delays in challenging such decisions can result in the dismissal of petitions for relief.
The court affirmed that the assessment of fitness by a Medical Board is an expert determination, and interference in such matters should be approached with caution.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the medical fitness for enrollment in the Indian Navy is determined based on specific medical conditions identified by the Appeal Medical Boar....
The court emphasized that a single testicle did not automatically render the petitioner unfit for Navy service, leading to the direction for a re-examination by the Medical Board.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the importance of adhering to the opinions of the Armed Forces/Navy specialists in matters of medical fitness for recruitment, particularly in t....
The presence of varicose veins was a ground of medical unfitness as per the Manual on Medical Examination and Medical Standards for Entries into army, and the opinion of private doctors cannot be acc....
The absence of clear guidelines indicating the refusal of a person to be examined by an Appeal Medical Board after being declared medically unfit by a specialist in a Review Medical Board.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
