YASHWANT VARMA
Raffles Education Investment (india) Pte Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Educomp Professional Education Limited – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. nature of the enforcement petition and relevant facts (Para 1 , 5) |
| 2. historical context of the arbitration and the interactions between parties (Para 2 , 4 , 12) |
| 3. arguments against the enforcement of the award (Para 3 , 36) |
| 4. court's observations on parties' affiliations (Para 11 , 19) |
| 5. discussion on public policy and foreign control in educational institutions (Para 18 , 20 , 28) |
| 6. court's rationale concerning public policy and enforcement of awards (Para 24 , 25 , 27) |
| 7. reiteration of legal principles governing enforcement of foreign awards (Para 32 , 33 , 41) |
| 8. overarching principles governing public policy and enforcement (Para 34 , 35 , 58) |
JUDGMENT
1. The instant petition preferred by Raffles Education Investment (India) Pte. Ltd. [Raffles] under Chapter-I, Part-II of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [The Act] seeks enforcement of a Final Award dated 31 March 2017 [Award] passed by the Singapore International Arbitration Centre [SIAC] in Arbitration No. 179 of 2015 under the SIAC Rules, 2013. The enforcement action is resisted by Educomp Professional Education Limited [Educomp] which asserts that the Award is not liable to be recognised or enfor
P.A. Inamdar v. State of Maharashtra
Devas Multimedia Private Limited v. Antrix Corporation Limited and Another
Gemini Bay Transcription (P) Ltd. v. Integrated Sales Service Ltd.
Indian School v. State of Rajasthan
Islamic Academy of Education v. State of Karnataka
National Agricultural Coop. Mktg. Federation of India v. Alimenta S.A.
PASL Wind Solutions (P) Ltd. v. GE Power Conversion (India) (P) Ltd.
Renusagar Power Co. Ltd. v. General Electric Co.
Shri Lal Mahal Ltd. v. Progetto Grano SPA
Ssangyong Engineering and Construction Company Ltd. v. National Highways Authority of India (NHAI)
T.M.A Pai Foundation & Ors. v. State of Karnataka & Ors.
Private educational institutions can set their own fee structures, provided they do not engage in profiteering or capitation fees, adhering to principles established in precedential Supreme Court cas....
Point of law: The right to establish an educational institution can be regulated; but such regulatory measures must, in general, be to ensure the maintenance of proper academic standards, atmosphere ....
(1) Director, Secondary Education has no authority to issue direction in respect of fee structure in respect of private unaided schools.(2) It is for school Management to reschedule payment of school....
Fee structure determined by the ‘Fee Fixation Committee’ constituted by the respondent University in supersession of fee structure already proposed by the ‘Fee Regulatory Committee’ constituted by th....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.