IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Navin Chawla, J.
Vandana Goswami – Appellant
Versus
Pooja Arora & Anr. – Respondents
TR.P.(C.) 111 of 2023
Decided On : 10-07-2023
Transfer of Suits - Partition - Family Dispute - The court allowed the transfer of two suits seeking partition of properties to be tagged and consolidated with a third suit, all involving siblings and inheritance disputes.
Fact of the Case:
The petition sought transfer of two suits seeking partition of properties to be consolidated with a third suit pending before the court, all involving siblings and inheritance disputes.
Finding of the Court:
The court allowed the transfer of the two suits to be tagged and consolidated with the third suit, with the third suit being the lead suit.
Issues: Transfer of suits, consolidation, pecuniary jurisdiction, inheritance disputes
Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the familial relationship between the parties, the nature of the disputes, and the willingness of the respondents to transfer the suits to the court where the third suit was pending.
Final Decision: The court directed the transfer of the two suits seeking partition to be consolidated with the third suit, with the third suit being the lead suit.
JUDGMENT
Navin Chawla, J. (Oral)
CM APPL. 33974/2023 (Exemption)
1. Allowed, subject all just exceptions.
TR.P.(C.) 111/2023 & CM APPL. 33973/2023
2. This petition has been filed seeking transfer of the two suits, being C.S. DJ No. 262/2021 titled Pooja Arora v. Vandana Goswami and Another, pending before the court of the learned Additional District Judge-1 (North), Rohini Courts, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the `First Suit') and C.S. DJ No. 416/2021 titled Pooja Arora v. Vandana Goswami and Another, pending before the Court of the learned Additional District Judge-04 (North), Rohini Courts, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the `Second Suit'), to be tagged and consolidated with CS (OS) No. 142/2023, titled Vandana Goswami v. Pooja Arora and Another, pending before this Court (hereinafter referred to as the `Third Suit').
3. Admittedly, the parties to the present petition and the above mentioned three suits are siblings, being children of late Sh. Subhash Chander and late Smt.Sanyogita Khetarpal.
4. The First Suit has been filed by the respondent no.1 against the petitioner and the respondent no.2, seeking partition of the property bearing No. 19/2, Second Floor, Third Floor and the Fourth Floor, Indira Vikas Colony, Delhi-110009, inter-alia stating therein that her father late Sh. Subhash Chander had acquired the said suit property and had died intestate on 19.02.2017, without executing any Will. The suit property was inherited by the parties herein on his demise. On the averments made in the said suit, the respondent no.1 prayed inter-alia for a decree of partition, possession and rent etc.
5. The Second Suit has been filed by the respondent no.1 against the petitioner claiming that she is the absolute owner of the suit property bearing No. 336-J, First Floor, Khasra No. 764/62, Village Dhakka Johar, Near Bhai Parmanand Colony, Delhi-110009, without roof/terrace rights, admeasuring 100 square yards, by virtue of the registered Will dated 19.12.2017, executed by the mother of the parties. She claims that she had also contributed in the purchase of the said property. The suit, on the basis of averments made therein, prays for a decree of declaration, possession and user charges, etc., from the petitioner herein.
6. The Third Suit has been filed by the petitioner herein against the respondents herein inter-alia claiming partition of various properties, including the properties for which the respondent no.1 herein has filed in the First and the Second Suit, claiming that the parents of the parties had died intestate and also denying the execution and the validity of the Will set up by the respondent no.1.
7. I must herein note that the learned counsels for the respondents, who appear on advance notice, submit that some of the properties mentioned in the Third Suit never belonged to the parents of the parties herein. They further submit that even the pecuniary jurisdiction of this Court has been wrongly invoked by the petitioner in filing of the Third Suit.
8. Without prejudice to their defence, they submit that they have no objection if the First and Second Suits are transferred to this Court, to be tried alongwith the Third Suit, which is already pending before this Court.
9. Accordingly, keeping all the defences of the respondents open in the Third Suit, it is directed that the Suit, being C.S. DJ No. 262/2021 titled Pooja Arora v. Vandana Goswami and Another, pending before the Court of the learned Additional District Judge- 1(North), Rohini Courts, Delhi, and C.S. DJ No. 416/2021 titled Pooja Arora v. Vandana Goswami and Another, pending before the Court of the learned Additional District Judge-04 (North), Rohini Courts, Delhi, be transferred to this Court and be tagged and consolidated with CS (OS) No. 142/2023, titled Vandana Goswami v. Pooja Arora and Another, pending before this Court, with the Third Suit being the lead Suit.
10. The petition and the pending application are disposed of in the above terms.
AI
(1) There is no prohibition for a person from producing, relying upon and claiming a right under a Will, in any proceeding instituted by others including other legal heirs for partition or other reli....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of the parties to partition of the suit property, rejection of preliminary objections raised by the defendant, and the passing of a....
Consistency in legal claims and amendments is essential for maintaining the integrity of proceedings.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.