Back
PRATHIBA M. SINGH
Chapter 4 Corp. – Appellant
Versus
Dhanpreet Singh Trading As M/s Punjabi Adda – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)
1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
I.A. 11834/2023 (for substitution)
2. This is an application seeking substitution of the authorized representative of the Plaintiff.
3. The earlier authorized representative was Major Sanjeev Chowdhry who has been replaced by Mr. Harshit Gupta. In view of the averments made in the application, substitution is allowed. Application is disposed of.
CS(COMM) 782/2022 & I.A. 18343/2022 (u/O XXXIX, Rule 1&2 CPC), 12263/2023 (u/O XXIII Rule 3 CPC)
4. The present suit for grant of permanent injunction was filed by the Plaintiff-Charter 4 Corp., seeking protection of its mark red-box device mark `SUPREME' [IMG] in respect of readymade clothing, accessories, etc. The Plaintiff adopted the mark `SUPREME' in 1994 in the U.S.A., and the same has been used in India since 2006 among Indian customers.
5. The Plaintiff also has a website supremenewyork.com, for promoting and marketing its goods. The Plaintiff has more than 700 registrations, globally for the mark `SUPREME' in classes such as Class-25, and it has been in continuous use. The Plaintiff also avers that it has filed applications for its `SUPREME'
The main legal point established in the judgment is the recognition and protection of a 'well-known' trademark under the Trade Marks Act, 1999, and the Copyright Act, 1957, based on extensive use, re....
The court ruled that despite the plaintiff's prior usage claim, the distinct markets of the parties and lack of confusion led to the dismissal of the injunction request.
The court confirmed the trademark's distinctiveness and secondary meaning of the `Arcuate Stitching Design`, granting permanent injunction against its infringement and imposing costs due to non-compl....
The court established that the rights of the prior user of a trademark are superior to those of a subsequent user, emphasizing the elements of goodwill, misrepresentation, and damage in passing off c....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the protection of trademarks, the likelihood of confusion or deception arising from the similarity of marks, and the prima facie case of infringeme....
Intellectual Property - Infringement of registered trade mark - Modify interim order - Subject to defendants filing an undertaking of their directors to abide by terms and conditions of undertaking a....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of trade mark infringement principles, including the assessment of phonetic, visual, and structural similarity of marks, and the gr....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the recognition of the mark 'BURGER KING' as a well-known mark under the Trade Marks Act, 1999, and the distinctiveness of trade marks.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of the plaintiff to a permanent injunction for passing off its mark 'SANDHI SUDHA' and the consideration of the defendants' non-rep....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
