Back
PRATHIBA M. SINGH
Burger King Company Llc – Appellant
Versus
Virendra Kumar Gupta – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral) - This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
2. These are three cancellation petitions under Section 57 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 and a suit under Section 134 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 filed by Burger King Company LLC against Defendant No.1-Ms. Ranjana Gupta, Defendant No.2-Mr. Virendra Kumar Gupta and Defendant No. 3-M/s Burger King (hereinafter, `the Defendants'). The Defendants were operating under the name and trading style of "Burger King Family Restaurant". The litigation between the parties has a long and checkered history.
3. In addition to the relief of permanent injunction against the Defendants, in CS(COMM) 229/2018, Burger King Company LLC also prays for declaration of the mark `BURGER KING' as a well-known mark under Section 2(1)(zg) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, as per paragraph 38 (e) of the prayer clause in the plaint.
Declaration as a `Well-Known' Mark
4. The Plaintiff-Burger King Company LLC is the proprietor of the mark `BURGER KING', which it had adopted in the year 1954, and has expanded over the years to more than 100 countries. The Plaintiff avers that it owns over 4000 trade mark and service mark applications acros
The central legal point established in the judgment is the recognition of the mark 'BURGER KING' as a well-known mark under the Trade Marks Act, 1999, and the distinctiveness of trade marks.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement to determine the prima facie tenability of the plea of invalidity of a registered trademark and the significance of 'bona fide use'....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the potential for the impugned mark to deceive the public and create confusion in the market, leading to the court's decision to stay its operat....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the application of Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC, and Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908, to grant an ex parte ad-interim injunction i....
Point of Law : Considering said registration, Plaintiff had filed a petition seeking cancellation of Defendant's mark before IPAB - Cancellation petition having been filed, infringement suit was stay....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the recognition and protection of a 'well-known' trademark under the Trade Marks Act, 1999, and the Copyright Act, 1957, based on extensive use, re....
A prior user of a trade mark has superior rights in passing off actions, preventing unauthorized use by subsequent users, especially when marks are likely to confuse consumers.
A registered trademark must be protected against infringement if it has established goodwill, even in the face of claims regarding dissimilarity of packaging.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the protection of registered trademarks, the establishment of goodwill and reputation, and the likelihood of confusion among consumers in passin....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
