SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
Sarvadaman Singh Oberoi – Appellant
Versus
Govt. of NCT of Delhi – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Satish Chandra Sharma, C.J. The instant Writ Petition was filed and argued by the Petitioner in person, seeking the following reliefs-
"I. Issue a writ/order/direction in the nature of quo warranto, mandamus or any other appropriate writ/order quashing Delhi Gazette. Pt. IV No. 259 dt. 24.11.2020, Govt. of the NCT of Delhi, N.C.T.D. No. 209 (SG-DL-E-25112020-223298) and/or;
II. Issue a writ/order/direction in the nature of quo warranto, mandamus or any other appropriate writ/order quashing Govt. of the NCT of Delhi Notification F.6/13/2011-Judl./Suptlaw/721-725 dt. 14.06.2011 and/or;
III. Issue a writ/order/direction in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ/order directing Respondents to ensure one Human Rights Court under Section 30 of Act 10 of 1994 in each of the eleven district courts of Delhi in accord with the International Rule of Law which is the mandate of Articles 51 and 253 of the Constitution of India, 1949 read with sub-section (d) & (f) of section 2 of Central Act No. 10 of 1994 within a period of 240 days or lesser period, preferably in seisen of the Learned District & Sessions Judge, as may be in the wisdom of this Hon'ble Court and/or;
IV. Issue
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.