SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 3517

SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN
Sanjeev Chanana – Appellant
Versus
Telestra Trade Place Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Ashish Upadhayay, Advocate, for the Petitioner.

JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. The present petition is filed under section 482 Cr.P.C. to set aside the impugned order dated 07.08.2019 passed by the court of Ms. Shruti Chaudhary, MM, Patiala House Courts in CC bearing no. 21046/2016 titled as Telestra Trade Place Pvt. Ltd. v Jagdambe Builders Pvt. Ltd. whereby the application under section 311 Cr.P.C. was dismissed.

2. The respondent filed a complaint under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against the petitioner and other accused, which is stated to be pending before the concerned trial court.

3. The petitioner who is accused no. 2 before the trial court filed an application under section 311 Cr.P.C., which was dismissed vide impugned order dated 07.08.2019 by observing that the application under section 311 Cr.P.C. was filed after a prolong period of 03 years, for which, no justification was given on behalf of the petitioner/accused no. 2 to explain the delay.

4. Section 311 Cr.P.C. deals with the power of the Court to summon material witness. It reads as under:

    "311. Any Court may, at any stage of any inquiry, trial or other proceeding under this Code, summon any person as a witness, or examine any person in attendanc

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top