IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Subramonium Prasad, J.
Deepanshu Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of NCT of Delhi & Anr. – Respondents
W.P.(C) 8811 of 2023 & CM APPL. 33327 of 2023
Decided On : 18-07-2023
Demolition Order - Public Land - Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 - [WPC No.13029/1985, Section 507(a) of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957]
Fact of the Case:
The Petitioner filed a Writ Petition seeking to quash the demolition order for a temple located on public land. The Religious Committee recommended the removal of the temple due to unauthorized construction causing traffic congestion and accidents.
Finding of the Court:
The Court found that the demolition order was based on the decision of the Religious Committee and the temple's location on public land, causing traffic congestion and increasing the chances of accidents.
Issues: The issue revolved around the legality of the demolition order in an urbanized area and the authority of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate to pass such orders.
Ratio Decidendi: The Court held that the Sub-Divisional Magistrate's action was in line with the decision of the Religious Committee and the temple's unauthorized construction on public land, justifying the demolition order.
Final Decision: The Writ Petition was dismissed, and pending applications were disposed of.
JUDGMENT
1. The present Writ Petition has been filed by the Petitioner seeking quashing of the demolition order dated 06.06.2023, passed by the Respondent No.2 herein, for demolition of the Hanuman and Shani Dev Mandir at Chhawla drain, Village Chhawla (hereinafter referred to as `the temple in question').
2. On 04.07.203 this Court directed the Respondents to file a Status Report. The Status Report has been filed.
3. Admittedly, the temple in question is located on a public land. In the Status Report it is stated that the question regarding relocation of the temple in question was considered by the Religious Committee in its meeting dated 13.09.2022. The said meeting was held under the Chairmanship of Secretary (Home) and was attended by the following officials:
| S.No | Name of Officer | Designation |
| 1. | Sh. Sudhir Kumar | Secretary (Home), Chairman |
| 2. | Ms. Asha Chaudhary Malhotra | Additional Secretary (Home) |
| 3. | Sh. Shakti Banger | Deputy Secretary (Home) |
| 4. | Sh. Brahamjeet Singh | ACP Command, Special Branch of Delhi |
| 5. | Sh. Nirav Patel | ACP |
| 6. | Shri Vikram Singh | Addl. DCP-1, Dwarka, New Delhi |
| 7. | Sh. Rajbir Malik | ACO/DIU/CD |
| 8. | Sh. Harsh Indora | Addl. DCP/SHD |
| 9. | Sh. Vinod Narang | ACP Mehrauli |
| 10. | Sh. P C Yadav | SHO/Mehrauli |
| 11. | Sh. Sachin Sharma | ADCP ED |
| 12. | Sh. V K Singh | EE PWD |
| 13. | Sh R D Meena | EE/PWD |
| 14. | Sh P.S. Chauhan | Executive Engineer, SR-1, PWD |
| 15. | Sh. Ashish Gupta | EE, SWR-11- |
| 16. | Sh. Jitendra Kumar | SE/I&FC |
| 17. | Sh. Narender Kumar | AE(I&FC Deptt.) |
| 18. | Sh. Ashok K. Rajdev | Pr. CE, PWD |
| 19. | Sh. Amit Kumar Singh | EE/ER, PWD |
| 20. | Sh. Surender Singh | SE, MCD |
| 21. | Sh. Pravin Dhaware. | AE (MCD) |
| 22. | Sh Surender Singh | ADH (MCD) |
| 23. | Sh. N K Jain | EE(Pr)NG2 |
| 24. | Sh. A K Yadav | AE/M-III SR(North) MCD |
| 25. | Mohd. Raoof | (LA) DWB |
| 26. | Sh. Nisab Ahmad Khan | Delhi Wakf Board |
| 27. | Sh. Bijender Singh | Patwari |
| 28. | Sh. Mukesh Meena | SE/East (PWD) |
| 29. | Sh. Bilas Khan | Delhi Wakf Board |
| 30. | Sh. Abhimanyu Kumar | SE (PWD) Shahdara |
4. The Minutes of Meeting records that the proposal of shifting the temple in question was received from Public Works Department (PWD), GNCTD. It is stated that the DCP (Special Branch) was requested by the PWD to submit its report in this regard and the DCP (Special Branch) vide a letter dated 20.12.2021 has informed the Department that the temple in question admeasuring about 50/60 Sq. Yards exists at Najafgarh drain, nearby B.S.F. Chhwala Camp, Village Chhwala, New Delhi for some years and is constructed with cement and tin shed. The Minutes of Meeting also reveals that in the previous meetings of Religious Committee regarding relocation of the temple in question it was decided that Irrigation and Flood Control Department, which is the land owning agency, shall organize meetings with all the stakeholders including the area MLA/Councillor and the caretaker of the temple in question in the presence of a representative of local police to explore the possibility of shifting/removal of the temple. It is stated that no decision was arrived at in the said meetings. The Religious Committee after going through all the photographs and facts on record and after taking into account that the temple in question was built in an unauthorized manner on a public land and is causing traffic jams and in view of increasing chances of accidents and on the basis of land owning agency's recommendation that the land on which the temple in question has been constructed is required for de-silting and development works, recommended for removal of the temple in question.
5. Consequently, Executive Engineer, Civil Division-I, Flood Control Department, intimated the District Magistrate (S/W) regarding the decision taken by the Religious Committee in its meeting dated 13.09.2022 and a request was made to the District Magistrate to inform the Special Task Force for immediate action and removal of the temple in question and also to maintain the law and order situation. Pursuant to the said communication, the demolition order dated 06.06.2023 was issued by the Office of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate (Kapashera) indicating that the demolition drive for demolition of the temple in
The authority of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate to pass demolition orders for religious structures constructed on public land, despite the urbanization of the area.
The court reaffirmed the principle that places of worship must not obstruct public pathways, allowing for the relocation of such structures to ensure public access and safety.
The main legal principle established is that the obligation to remove unauthorized constructions on public land, including religious structures, is mandated by the Circular of 05 May 2014 and the Sup....
Public Interest Litigation must address genuine concerns over encroachments, substantiated by evidence. Proposals for infrastructure should balance urban needs and preservation of community sentiment....
The court balanced the larger public interest with the interests of the places of worship and directed the PWD to make the pedestrian pathway uniform, allowing for demolition and reconstruction while....
Court ordered removal of unauthorized encroachments on public roads to ensure free access, setting a timeline for compliance.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.