SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 2993

DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
Avdesh – Appellant
Versus
State of (NCT of Delhi) – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr.Rajat Katyal and Mr. Mayank Purnia, Advocates, for the Petitioner.
Mr.Amit Sahni, APP, for the State. SI Kamal Chaudhary, PS Prem Nagar.

Judgement Key Points

Key Points: - The court considered period of incarceration, examination of the victim and her mother in granting bail [11000784120006] - The bail was granted under Section 439 Cr.P.C. with a personal bail bond of Rs.15,000 and one surety of Rs.15,000, subject to conditions [11000784120008] - The decision relied on principles from Kalyan Chandra Sarkar v. Rajesh Ranjan, 2004 SCC 7 528 (bail should be granted with reasons, considering nature of accusation, evidence, and risk of tampering) (!) (!) (!) (!) - The case involves offences under Section 354 IPC and 8 POCSO Act; victim and mother already examined [p_?][11000784120001] - The petitioner is in custody since 28.07.2022; order emphasizes prima facie case, gravity, and potential threat to witnesses [11000784120006] (!) - Conditions include no leaving India without permission, no coercion of witnesses, provision of mobile number, and updating address changes (!) (!) (!) (!) - The application for early hearing (CRL.M.A. 23978/2022) was taken up and disposed with regular bail [11000784120001][11000784120009] - The order is binding on the Jail Superintendent for compliance [11000784120010]

What is the standard for grant of bail in serious offences as applied in this case?

What is the appropriate amount and conditions for regular bail granted under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in this matter?

What are the factors considered by the court in granting bail under Kalyan Chandra Sarkar v. Rajesh Ranjan?


JUDGMENT

Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)

BAIL APPLN. 2858/2022, CRL.M.A. 23978/2022 (for early hearing)

1. An application bearing number CRL.M.A. 23978/2022 has been filed for early hearing of the present bail application. In view of the grounds explained, the bail application has been taken up for hearing.

2. Present application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.0391 dated 24.05.2022 registered under Section 354 IPC and 8 POCSO Act at PS Prem Nagar.

3. The facts in brief are that on 22.05.2022 at about 11 a.m., when the complainant was on way to her sister-in-law's house, the applicant asked the complainant to come inside and make chapatti for him as he was alone at his home. Allegedly, as soon as the complainant entered the house of the applicant, the applicant locked the door, grabbed the complainant in his arms and kissed her on her neck. The applicant also allegedly tried to lift the frock of the complainant. When the complainant shouted for help, applicant tried to cover her mouth with his hands. However, on hearing her daughter's cry, the mother of the complainant rescued her.

4. On the statement of the complainant, the presen

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top