SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 3509

DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
Vikas – Appellant
Versus
State (N. C. T. of Delhi) – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Rahul Thakur, Advocate, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Amit Sahni, APP, for the State with Inspector Pawan Kumar, PS Narela.

JUDGMENT

Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)

CRL.M.A. 10610/2023 in BAIL APPLN. 815/2022

1. The present application has been moved seeking an early hearing.

2. For the reasons stated in the application, it is allowed.

BAIL APPLN. 815/2022

3. The present application has been filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 on behalf of the applicant seeking regular bail in FIR bearing No. 228/2020 registered at Police Station Narela for an offence punishable under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the only evidence which is available against the applicant is the disclosure statement made by the applicant/accused and his refusal to take part in TIP proceedings. Learned counsel for the applicant further submits that the applicant is in custody since 09.07.2021. It is further submitted that the charge sheet has already been filed, however, the charges have yet not been framed and the trial may take a long time.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the bail application and submits that the present FIR was lodged on the statement of Durga Singh wherein he has alleged that on the intervening night of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top