IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
C. Hari Shankar, J.
EWAC Alloys Limited - Appellant
Versus
Essen Welding Alloys Pvt. Ltd. - Respondent
I.A. 3516 of 2021 in CS(COMM) 619 of 2019
Decided On : 08-03-2021
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. settlement terms between parties. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. counsel present and application jointly filed. (Para 3) |
| 3. suit decreed as per settlement. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
I.A.3516/2021 (under Order XXIII Rule 3 of CPC)
1. This is an application under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for decreeing the suit on the basis of the settlement arrived at between the parties.
2. During the pendency of the proceedings, the parties have amicably resolved their disputes. The terms of the settlement, as contained in para 3 of the present application are as under:
"i. The Plaintiff unconditionally undertake to withdraw its suit against the Defendant seeking permanent injunction restraining infringement of trade mark and copyright, passing off, unfair competition, rendition of accounts/damages, delivery up, etc. and/or any other reliefs claimed in its prayer clause at paragraph 50 of the Plaint.
ii. The Defendant unconditionally undertake to withdraw its counterclaim against the Plaintiff seeking permanent injunction restraining infringement of copyright, passing off, unfair competition, rendition of accounts/damages, delivery up, etc. and/or any other reliefs claimed in its prayer clause at paragraphs l6 & l7 of the Counter-Claim."
3. Learned Counsel for the parties are present. The application has been jointly filed by both parties as well as their learned Counsel.
4. Accordingly, nothing survives for adjudication in the present matter. The suit is decreed in terms of the settlement arrived at between the parties, the terms whereof already stand reproduced hereinabove. The parties shall be bound by the terms of settlement.
5. Let the Registry draw up a decree sheet accordingly.
6. The plaintiff shall be entitled to refund of 50% of the court fee deposited by it.
7. The next date of 16th April, 2021 shall stand cancelled.
Mutual settlement of disputes allows parties to withdraw claims under Order XXIII Rule 3, leading to court decreeing the suit based on agreed terms.
Parties may settle disputes leading to a decree under Order XXIII, Rule 3 of the CPC, provided the terms are clear and binding.
The court upheld a consent decree based on a lawful settlement between parties regarding trademark and copyright rights, allowing for a refund of court fees.
Enforcement of settlement terms under Order XXIII Rule 3 of CPC and decreeing of the suit in terms of the settlement
Amicable settlement allows withdrawal of suit and extinguishment of claims upon mutual agreement between parties.
Settlement terms agreed upon by parties can resolve litigation, requiring court endorsement and issuing of decrees consistent with those terms.
The court upheld the settlement agreement and decreed the suit in accordance with the terms of settlement, thereby recognizing the proprietary rights of the plaintiff's trademarks and trade dress.
A settlement agreement binds the parties, allowing for a decree based on its terms, reinforcing the importance of procedural compliance in legal settlements.
Enforceability of settlement agreements and their impact on the resolution of disputes.
Parties reaching an amicable settlement qualify for court fee refunds, and private negotiations are acknowledged as valid dispute resolution methods under relevant statutes.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.