IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Subramonium Prasad, J.
Alphia James – Appellant
Versus
Badminton Association of India & Ors. – Respondents
W.P.(C) 9638 of 2023 & CM Appls. 38106 of 2023 & 37412 of 2023
Decided On : 28-07-2023
Para Athlete - Selection Criteria for Asian Para Games 2023 - Minutes of Meeting April 26, 2017 of the Sports Authority of India, International Paralympics Committee's guidelines - The court upheld the decision of the Badminton Association of India and the Paralympic Committee of India in restricting the selection trials for the Indian Para Badminton Team for the Asian Para Games 2023 to players meeting specific performance criteria, emphasizing the importance of selecting players with a probability of winning medals in the games.
Fact of the Case:
The Petitioner, a para athlete, challenged the decision to change the criteria for participation in the selection trials for the Asian Para Games 2023 after a list of 55 probables had been finalized. The Petitioner argued that only the Paralympic Committee of India (PCI) had the authority to lay down the criteria for selecting the teams.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the decision to change the selection criteria was valid, emphasizing the importance of selecting the best team to represent the country in the Asian Para Games. The court also noted that the PCI acts as a nodal agency in multi-disciplinary sports events like the Asian Para Games, and upheld the criteria set by the Badminton Association of India and the PCI.
Issues: The main issue was whether the respondents could introduce a new criteria for selection trials after finalizing a list of probables for the Asian Para Games 2023, and whether the court should exercise its discretion under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to quash such decision.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that in matters of selecting the best person to represent the country in international events, the courts should not interfere with the criteria set out by the experts in the field. It also highlighted the importance of selecting players with a probability of winning medals in the games.
Final Decision: The Writ Petition was dismissed, and the court upheld the decision of the Badminton Association of India and the Paralympic Committee of India in restricting the selection trials for the Indian Para Badminton Team for the Asian Para Games 2023 to players meeting specific performance criteria.
JUDGMENT (Oral)
Subramonium Prasad, J.
1. The Petitioner, who is a Para athlete, has approached this Court invoking Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the decision taken in a meeting dated 23.06.2023 and the notification dated 04.07.2023, issued by the Respondent No.1 laying down the criteria for participation in the selection trials to select a team for the Asian Para Games 2023 which are scheduled to be held in Hangzhou China from 20-28 October 2023.
2. It is stated that the Petitioner met with an accident whereby her lower limbs were paralysed but she fought back and started her career as a para athlete in the sports of Badminton. It is stated that she has won National Para Badminton Championship 2021 which was held in Odisha by wining Gold Medal in both singles and doubles event. It is stated that the Petitioner has participated in several international para badminton tournaments as well.
3. It is the contention of the Petitioner that on 21.06.2023 Respondent No.1 published a list of probables for the Indian Para Badminton Team for the Asian Para Games 2023 wherein 55 para athletes were finalized, including the Petitioner herein. It is stated that within two days of publishing the said list, Respondent No.1 & 2 introduced a new criteria for selection trials for Asian Para Games, 2023 which made it impossible for several players especially single wheelchair players both men and women to get selected even for trials.
4. Notice in the Writ Petition was issued on 21.07.2023. Replies have been filed.
5. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner contends that the Paralympic Committee of India (PCI), also referred as National Paralympic Committee by the International Paralympic Committee (IPC), is the sole organization in India as per IPC Handbook for promotion and development of Para Sports for the persons with disabilities, including intellectually and visually impaired persons. He states that PCI, which has been formed for the promotion and development of Para Sports can alone lay down the criteria for selecting the teams and no other organization can be permitted to have any say in the matter of selection of team to represent the country in the Para Games across the world. He further states that once a list of 55 probables has been finalized on 21.06.2023 then only those 55 probables could have participated in the selection trials and the criteria could not have been changed and that too at the instance of a third party who cannot have any say in the matter of selection of a team of para athletes. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner stresses on the point that the rules of the game cannot be changed after the game has begun and that new candidates cannot be brought in for the purpose of selection of a team after a list of 55 probables has been finalized.
6. On 27.07.2023 it was stated by the learned Counsels for the PCI, the Badminton Association of India and the Union of India that the team to represent India in the Asian Para Games 2023 is selected as per the criteria fixed by the Badminton Association of India and the PCI only forwards the names as stated by the Badminton Association of India. This Court directed the Counsel for the PCI to file an affidavit to this effect. In compliance to the said order, an affidavit dated 27.07.2023 has been handed over in Court by the Counsel for the PCI. Learned Counsel for the PCI has been directed to ensure the affidavit is also placed on record. Relevant portions of the said affidavit reads as under:
"2. In terms of the International Paralympics Committee's (IPC) guidelines. (reference of which is made in terms of Minutes of Meeting April 26, 2017 of the Sports Authority of India at New Delhi) that disciplines like athletics, Swimming, Shooting and Power Lifting would be directly administered by the National Paralympics Committee (NPC) and other disciplines, such as Archery, Badminton, Table Tennis, Lawn Tennis etc. would be handled by the respective able-bodied Natio
The discretion of the National Sports Federation in making selection decisions and the limited scope of judicial review in matters of sports representation.
The court emphasized the need to avoid interference in the selection criteria set by the National Sports Federation and to trust the expertise of the Committee in making decisions related to athlete ....
The court emphasized the importance of conducting selection processes in a free and fair manner and desisted from taking action against the petitioner for filing a fudged document, considering her ag....
Judicial review in sports policy matters is limited to cases of evident arbitrariness; courts should defer to the expertise of selection committees unless clear injustice is demonstrated.
The court established that the selection process for Olympic representation must strictly adhere to established eligibility criteria, and arbitrary deviations undermine fundamental fairness and trans....
The selection of athletes for the 2020 Tokyo Paralympics must adhere to established eligibility criteria and be conducted in a transparent and fair manner, avoiding arbitrary deviations.
The decision to restrict participation in the National Games to Indian Passport holders is upheld, emphasizing the limited scope of judicial review in matters of policy.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.