SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 2400

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, MANOJ JAIN
Kamlesh Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Yogender Kumar Sharma – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Atul Kumar and Mr. Nishant Prakash, Advocates with appellant in person.
Respondent in person (through VC).

JUDGMENT

Manoj Jain, J. Appellant-wife is aggrieved by judgment dated 23.08.2012 passed by the Court of Ld. Addl. District Judge-01 (East), Karkardooma Courts, Delhi whereby a petition seeking divorce filed by her husband (respondent herein) has been allowed and their marriage has been directed to be dissolved under Section 13 (1)(i-a) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 on the ground of cruelty. For the sake of convenience, appellant herein shall be referred to as `wife' and respondent as `husband'.

2. Marriage between the parties was solemnized in Delhi on 02.05.1982 as per Hindu rites and customs. They were blessed with three children and as on date, they all have already attained age of discretion. The Husband filed the divorce petition contending that disputes between them arose from the first day of the marriage itself. He alleged that the behaviour of his wife was very rough and she also used to claim that such marriage had been solemnized against her wishes as she had succumbed to the desire of her parents.

3. It was also averred by the husband that his wife left his company in 1989 though she kept on residing in the same house. She also filed false cases against him. She reporte

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top