SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 2423

V. KAMESWAR RAO, ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA
Mohar Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. A.K. Bhakt, Advocate, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Raj Kumar, SPC for UOI.

JUDGMENT

V. Kameswar Rao, J. (Oral)

CM APPL. 37313/2023

Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.

Application stands disposed of.

W.P.(C) 9735/2023

1. The challenge in this writ petition is to the orders dated July 29, 2021, in the Original Application No.1309/2019 (`OA', for short) and order dated October 12, 2022, in R.A. No.69/2021 in OA 1309/2019, passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench, New Delhi (`Tribunal', for short) whereby the Tribunal has dismissed the OA as well as the review application filed by the petitioner herein.

2. The case of the petitioner in the OA was basically with regard to the change of his date of birth. As per the respondents, the petitioner's date of birth is July 6, 1961 whereas the petitioner was claiming his date of birth to be July 6, 1968. The petitioner was appointed as Casual Khalasi with the respondents in the year 1986. He was appointed as unscreened substitute (Cleaner) on July 13, 1994. It was his case that in the year 2013, he came to know that his date of birth in the monthly pay slip has been shown incorrectly. He made several representations for correcting the same since 2013. Finally, he filed OA No. 815/2018,


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top