SURESH KUMAR KAIT, NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
Mohit Mittal, – Appellant
Versus
Kanika Jain – Respondent
JUDGMENT (Oral)
1. The present Appeals under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act has been filed on behalf of the appellant/husband against the impugned Order dated 19.04.2023 vide which the two Applications under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 in HMA No. 1496/2018 and HMA No. 843/2018 claiming maintenance in the sum of Rs.88,000/- per month or one-time expense of Rs.4-5 lakhs as maintenance and litigation costs respectively on the ground that due to multiple litigations initiated by the respondent/wife against him, were dismissed.
2. The appellant/husband was married to the respondent/wife on 27.04.2016 as per the Hindu rites and ceremonies.
3. Allegedly, the respondent/wife deserted the appellant/husband on 02.07.2016 i.e., after about two months of marriage.
4. The appellant/husband filed the petition bearing HMA No. 1496/2018 under Section 12(1)(c) read with Section 13(1) (i-a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for divorce and the respondent/wife also filed petition bearing HMA No. 843/2022 under Section 13(1) (ia) read with Section 13(1)(ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for grant of divorce; both the petitions are pending trial.
5. During the pendency of the a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.