SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 1407

ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Shakti Katara – Appellant
Versus
Shailendra Sharma – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Maneesh Sharma, Through Vc, for the Appellant
Mr. D.K. Dixit, Through Vc, for the Respondent.

ORDER

1. By this appeal a challenge has been made to the order dated 17.02.2020 passed by the Court of learned Additional District Judge No.1, Hindaun City, Karauli (for short 'the learned Court below') by which the application filed by the appellant-wife under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short 'the Act of 1955') has been disposed of by the learned Court below by observing that the wife is getting maintenance of Rs.6500/- per month in the proceedings under Section 125 Cr.P.C. So, there is no need to pass any further order for granting maintenance to her. However, a lump sum amount of Rs.4000/- has been awarded as expenses towards litigation.

2. Brief facts of this case are that the marriage of the appellant and respondent was solemnised on 17.06.2009. The respondent filed a divorce petition under Section 13 of the Act of 1955, against the appellant before the Court below on the grounds of cruelty and desertion. During the pendency of the divorce petition, the appellant filed an application under Section 24 of the Act of 1955 claiming maintenance pendente lite and expenses from the respondent pleading that the respondent is a Government Lecturer and is getting sala

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top