SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 3089

VIBHU BAKHRU, AMIT MAHAJAN
Google Llc – Appellant
Versus
Drs Logistics (P. )Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate with Mr Neel Mason, Mr Ankit Rastogi, Mr Vihan Dang, Mr. Aditya Gupta, Ms. Abhilasha Nautiyal, Ms Aditi Umapathy, Mr Parva Khare, Mr Sauhard Aulang and Ms Devangini Rai, Advocates, for the Google LLC/Google India Pvt. Ltd.
Mr. Arun Kathpalia & Mr Chander M. Lall, Senior Advocates with Ms Nancy Roy, Mr Jeevesh Nagrath, Ms Ananya Chug, Ms. Prakriti Varshney, Ms Kirti Mewar and Mr Arjun Gaur, Advocates, for R-1 & 2.
Ms Sriparna Dutta Choudhury, Advocate, for R-3 in FAO(OS)(COMM) 2/2022, for thee Appellant in FAO(OS) (COMM) 22/2022 & CM Nos. 5879/2022 & 5882/2022.
Mr Kshitij Parashar, Advocate, for R-4.

Table of Content
1. impugned judgment details appellate context. (Para 1 , 2)
2. factual background on google and drs. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
3. drs alleges trademark infringement. (Para 8 , 9)
4. explanation of google ads programme. (Para 10 , 11 , 12)
5. contentions and arguments regarding trademark use. (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31)
6. court's analysis of trademark infringement. (Para 36 , 37 , 38 , 39)
7. court's observations on use as keywords. (Para 55 , 56 , 57)
8. conclusion of the judgment. (Para 189 , 190 , 191)

JUDGMENT

Vibhu Bakhru, J.

INDEX

    I. INTRODUCTION

    II. FACTUAL CONTEXT

    III. THE ADS PROGRAMME

    IV. THE CONTROVERSY

    V. THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

    VI. CONTENTIONS ADVANCED ON BEHALF OF GOOGLE

    VII. CONTENTIONS ADVANCED ON BEHALF OF DRS ANALYSIS:

    VIII. USE OF TRADEMARKS AS KEYWORDS, WHETHER USE

    IX. META-TAGS & KEYWORDS

    X. USE OF TRADEMARKS AS KEYWORDS, WHETHER `USE' BY GOOGLE

    XI. USE OF TRADEMARK AS KEYWORDS ABSENT ANY CONFUSION, UNFAIR ADVANTAGE, DILUTION OR COMPROMISE OF THE TRADEMARK, IS NOT INFRINGEMENT

    XI.I. INITIAL INTEREST CONFUSION

    XI.II UNFAIR ADVANTAGE DETRIMENTAL TO DISTINCTIVE CHARACTER OR REPUTE OF A TRADEMARK

    XII. CONTRIBUTORY INFRINGEMENT

    XIII. WHETHER GOOGLE IS ABSOLVED OF ANY LIABILITY B

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top