SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 3136

SURESH KUMAR KAIT, NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
State – Appellant
Versus
Maikale Ram – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Tarang Srivastava learned, APP, for the State.
None, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT (Oral)

CRL.M.A. 6197/2023 (Condonation of Delay)

1. The petitioner has filed the present application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, read with Section 482 Cr.P.C for Condonation of 274 days delay in filing the present appeal with the following prayer:

    "(a) Condone the delay of 274 days in filing of the present Appeal;

    (b) Pass such other order/s as may be deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case."

2. FIR No.501/1992 was registered under Section 147/143/149/302/201/323 IPC at P.S. Nangloi (relating to the incidents of rioting, looting and killing of Sikhs throughout the State of NCT Delhi which took place between 31.10.1984 and 03.11.1984). The charges were framed and after the trial the accused were acquitted by the learned ASJ vide judgment dated 29.04.1995.

3. A Writ Petition Criminal bearing No.9/2016 with the case title S. Gurlad Singh Kahlon vs. Union of India & Ors. was filed in which the Supreme Court vide Order dated 11.01.2018 directed the SIT to be constituted, under the Chairmanship of Justice S.N. Dhingra, former Judge of Delhi High Court.

4. The SIT submitted its Report in which a recommendation was made that the appeal ma

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top