SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN
Hemlata – Appellant
Versus
State & Others – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. Marriage is considered to be an institution of trust, tolerance and mutual understanding but sometimes individual incompatibilities, attitudinal differences, maladjustment, psychological and other issues cause differences in matrimonial relationship.
2. The petitioner got married with Subhash who was son of the respondents no 2 & 3 according to Hindu rites and customs on 26.11.2007. The respondents no 2 to 5 are in-laws of the petitioner being family members of Subhash. The matrimonial differences stated to be arisen in matrimonial relationship of the petitioner and Subhash. The petitioner filed a complaint dated 21.11.2014 before CAW Cell, Nanak Pura wherein she alleged that her father had spent more than 7/8 lacs in marriage and had given jewellery gold and silver, household articles and a motorcycle. Subhash and the respondents no 2 to 5 were not happy with dowry articles and jewellery given in the marriage and started to taunt and beat the petitioner. The petitioner came to know that Subhash used to consume liquor frequently. The petitioner was not allowed to take rest during pregnancy. The father of the petitioner paid entire expenses of the hospital at the time
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.