SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 3900

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Poonam A. Bamba, J.
Sopl Private Limited Through Autorized Signatory Harsh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Naveen Patel – Respondent
FAO 178 of 2023 & CM APPL. 37228 of 2023
Decided On : 09-08-2023

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Manoj Kumar Garg, Adv. , for the Appellant.
None, for the Respondent.

The central legal point established is that the definition of 'commercial dispute' under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 must be interpreted in line with the nature of the property and the purpose of the lease.

Headnote:

Commercial Dispute - Property Lease - The court interpreted the definition of 'commercial dispute' under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 and concluded that the property leased for residential and 'services under bed and breakfast scheme' did not fall within the ambit of a commercial dispute.

Fact of the Case:

The appellant appealed against the order returning the plaint to adopt the procedure for filing a commercial suit, arguing that the property in question was residential and not exclusively for trade and commerce.

Finding of the Court:

The court set aside the impugned order, stating that the property was not leased exclusively for commercial purposes and did not fall within the definition of a 'commercial dispute' under the Act.

Issues: Interpretation of the definition of 'commercial dispute' under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 and whether the property in question was exclusively used for trade and commerce.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the definition of 'commercial dispute' and previous judgments to conclude that the property leased for residential and 'services under bed and breakfast scheme' did not qualify as a commercial dispute.

Final Decision: The impugned order was set aside, and the court directed the lower court to proceed in the matter as per law. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.

JUDGMENT

Poonam A. Bamba, J. (Oral)

1.0. Vide this appeal, the appellant is assailing the order dated 13.07.2023 passed by Ld. ADJ-03, South, Saket Courts, New Delhi, in Civil Suit no. CS no. 387/2023. Vide impugned order, ld. ADJ returned the plaint to the appellant/plaintiff to adopt the procedure for filing of commercial suit observing that in terms of Section 2 (c) Commercial Courts Act, 2015 (The Act) the dispute in question would fall within the domain of commercial court.

2.0. Ld. counsel for the appellant submits that no commercial dispute is involved in the present case as the property in question is residential in nature and was leased out to the respondent for the purpose of residential as well as 'services under bed and breakfast scheme`. Thus, it was not leased exclusively for the purpose of trade and commerce. Reference in this respect is made to sale deed and lease deed in question. Further, the appellant`s suit for recovery of possession, arrears of rent, mesne profit, damages and mandatory and permanent injunction has been valued @ Rs. 10,84,623/-. Thus, the suit was very much triable by the Ld. ADJ. In support of his arguments, ld. counsel has relied upon the judgment of Hon`ble Supreme Court dated 04.10.2019 in Civil Appeal no. 7843/2019, in Ambalal Sarabhai Enterprises Ltd. vs. K.S. Infraspace LLP & Anr.

3.0. The 'commercial dispute` is defined in Section 2 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015. Sub-clause (vii) of clause (c) of sub-section (1) of the same reads:

"2. Definitions.--(1)

(c) 'commercial dispute' means a dispute arising out of--

.............

(vii) agreements relating to immovable property used exclusively in trade or commerce;"

4.0. From the plain reading of the definition of the commercial dispute, it is clear that dispute arising of agreement relating to immovable property used exclusively in trade and commerce only, would fall in the category of commercial dispute. It would be pertinent to refer here to the judgment of this Court in Mrs. Soni Dave vs. M/s Trans Asian Industries Expositions Pvt. Ltd., 2016 SCC Online Del 4282, wherein this Court inter alia, observed that :

"16. I may in this regard also observe that a property, prescribed user whereof as per the law i.e. the Master Plan and the municipal laws is residential, even if let out for use exclusively in trade or commerce or when, without being so let out, is used exclusively in trade or commerce, the same would still not qualify as an immovable property used exclusively in trade or commerce within the meaning of Section 2(1)(c)(vii) of the Commercial Courts Act. The Commercial Courts Act has brought only disputes arising out of transactions relating to immovable property used exclusively in trade or commerce within the ambit of a =commercial dispute.` The legislature could not have intended to bring disputes arising out of transactions relating to immovable property illegally used exclusively in trade or commerce within the ambit of commercial disputes.....

18. Following the said principles, Section 2(1)(c)(vii) has to be read and interpreted as `immovable property which is in accordance with law, used exclusively in trade or commerce" and not as immovable property which, in contravention of law, is used exclusively in trade or commerce."

5.0. In the instant case, as per the copy of the lease-deed dated 09.10.2019 placed on record by the appellant, the property bearing no. C-4/77/2, First and second floor, Safdarjung Development Area, New Delhi, was leased to the respondent for his 'residence` as well as for the purpose of 'services under bread and breakfast scheme`. Thus the property was not leased exclusively for the commercial purpose/services under bread and breakfast scheme.

5.1. Further, as per the sale deed and the lease deed, clause 12 of which reads :

".12.....Lessee shall be responsible for any penalty/levies damage/surcharge/additional levies/additional taxes/increase in Municipal taxes and any other taxes/charges because of chan

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top